Nexusguard vs Cloudflare WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nexusguard and Cloudflare WAF.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Nexusguard
0 reviews
4.2/5
Cloudflare WAF
0 reviews
Cloudflare WAF is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.6). Nexusguard provides cloud-based DDoS mitigation and Web Application Firewall (WAF) services. Built for enterprises handling high-volume traffic who need automated threat detection and rapid attack response. Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules.
Nexusguard Enterprise DDoS protection and WAF for high-traffic applications | Cloudflare WAF Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Communications service providers, ISPs, and APAC-heavy enterprises that want carrier-grade, flat-rate managed DDoS mitigation with white-label resale options. | Any website behind Cloudflare that wants a maintained application firewall and DDoS absorption as a baseline — from hobby projects on the free tier to compliance-bound businesses on Business or Enterprise. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protection | free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Nexusguard → | Visit Cloudflare WAF → | |
Nexusguard
Pros
- + Flat-rate pricing that does not penalize customers during attacks
- + True Hybrid architecture: on-site Bastions appliances plus global cloud scrubbing with automatic spill-over
- + Eighteen-year track record inside 100+ CSPs protecting 50,000+ ASNs
- + DNS Protection with a guaranteed 100% availability SLA
- + Geolocation-aware scrubbing routing with automatic health-check failover
- + White-label DDoS-protection-as-a-service program for carriers and MSSPs
Cons
- - No public pricing, no free tier, no self-service onboarding — quote-only sales engagement
- - Deployment requires DNS rerouting, BGP, or GRE tunnels: real setup complexity
- - CSP-first product roadmap; enterprises are often served through resellers
- - WAF is a layered add-on, not a standalone application-security platform
- - Scrubbing-center count is inconsistent across the vendor's own pages (40+ vs 50+)
Cloudflare WAF
Pros
- + WAF engine and managed ruleset included on every plan, including Free
- + Unmetered DDoS absorption at the edge on all tiers
- + Central rules maintenance — no appliances, agents or rule deployments to manage
- + Attack-score and bot-management layers available as needs grow
- + Flat plan pricing; no per-request or per-rule metering
Cons
- - Advanced rate limiting, attack-score rules and full log export are plan-gated
- - Managed rules can block legitimate traffic; tuning requires a logging-first workflow
- - Free plan limits request body inspection to 1 MB
- - Only applies to proxied records — DNS-only traffic is not filtered
- - A compensating control, not a substitute for fixing application vulnerabilities
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.