Nexusguard vs Akamai
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nexusguard and Akamai.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Nexusguard
0 reviews
4.1/5
Akamai
0 reviews
Akamai is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.6). Nexusguard provides cloud-based DDoS mitigation and Web Application Firewall (WAF) services. Built for enterprises handling high-volume traffic who need automated threat detection and rapid attack response. Akamai invented the CDN industry in 1998. 340,000+ servers in 130+ countries. Enterprise CDN, edge security, and media delivery at massive scale. Acquired Linode for cloud compute.
Nexusguard Enterprise DDoS protection and WAF for high-traffic applications |  Akamai The original CDN — 4,400+ edge PoPs across 130+ countries | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Communications service providers, ISPs, and APAC-heavy enterprises that want carrier-grade, flat-rate managed DDoS mitigation with white-label resale options. | Global media and streaming platforms, gaming backends, and attack-prone enterprises that need the largest edge footprint and top-tier DDoS scrubbing under enterprise contracts |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protection | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Nexusguard → | Visit Akamai → | |
Nexusguard
Pros
- + Flat-rate pricing that does not penalize customers during attacks
- + True Hybrid architecture: on-site Bastions appliances plus global cloud scrubbing with automatic spill-over
- + Eighteen-year track record inside 100+ CSPs protecting 50,000+ ASNs
- + DNS Protection with a guaranteed 100% availability SLA
- + Geolocation-aware scrubbing routing with automatic health-check failover
- + White-label DDoS-protection-as-a-service program for carriers and MSSPs
Cons
- - No public pricing, no free tier, no self-service onboarding — quote-only sales engagement
- - Deployment requires DNS rerouting, BGP, or GRE tunnels: real setup complexity
- - CSP-first product roadmap; enterprises are often served through resellers
- - WAF is a layered add-on, not a standalone application-security platform
- - Scrubbing-center count is inconsistent across the vendor's own pages (40+ vs 50+)
Akamai
Pros
- + Unmatched edge reach: 4,400+ PoPs across 130+ countries and 1,200+ networks
- + Prolexic DDoS scrubbing is the industry reference: 20+ Tbps dedicated capacity, zero-second mitigation, 100% platform availability SLA
- + Two decades-plus of delivery track record at the largest media and event scale
- + Aggressive egress pricing on the Akamai Cloud compute side, inherited from the Linode acquisition
- + Edge compute (EdgeWorkers, Functions) plus core and distributed compute regions under one network
Cons
- - No public pricing — quote-based enterprise procurement with real sales-cycle overhead
- - Not an option for individuals, small businesses, or anyone who wants self-serve onboarding
- - Dense, modular product catalog that is easy to over-buy or misconfigure
- - Volume commitments can make traffic overruns expensive
- - Compute breadth is thin compared with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.