Skip to content

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

A detailed comparison to help you choose between New Relic and Elastic Observability.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

New Relic

0 reviews

4.0/5

Elastic Observability

0 reviews

Both New Relic and Elastic Observability are equally rated at 4.0/5. New Relic is a full-stack observability platform with a unique pricing model: 100GB free data ingest/month. APM, infrastructure, browser monitoring, synthetics, and logs in one platform. Unified observability platform that collects and analyzes metrics, logs, and traces from servers, applications, and services. Built for DevOps teams managing complex distributed systems.

New Relic

New Relic

Full-stack observability — 100GB free per month

Elastic Observability

Elastic Observability

Real-time visibility into infrastructure, applications, and logs

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forEngineering teams that want APM, infrastructure, and logs in one platform with usage-based pricing and a genuinely free starting pointEngineering teams running Elasticsearch who need consolidated observability with high-volume log retention and can manage the platform's operational complexity
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots✓
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tierapi accessteam features
free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features
Visit New Relic →Visit Elastic Observability →

New Relic

Pros

  • + Best free tier in observability: 100 GB ingest/month, one full platform user, unlimited basic users, no credit card
  • + No per-host, per-agent, per-container, or per-function charges — cost tracks telemetry, not fleet size
  • + Published unit pricing: $0.40/GB original data, $0.60/GB Data Plus, $49 core users, $10/$99 Standard full users
  • + One platform for APM, infrastructure, logs, browser/mobile, synthetics, and alerting with NRQL across all of it
  • + Published support response SLAs per edition (2 business days Standard, 2-hour critical Pro, 1-hour Enterprise)

Cons

  • - Pro full platform users at $349/user (annual) or $418.80 monthly make seat costs the dominant expense
  • - Free tier hard-stops ingest and platform access past 100 GB until the next month or an upgrade
  • - Uptime commitments are contract-defined and vacated on Standard — no availability SLA below Pro
  • - Cost forecasting across ingest tiers, user types, and Advanced Compute metering takes real effort
  • - SaaS-only with US/EU data residency; NRQL dashboards and alerts carry switching costs
View full New Relicreview →

Elastic Observability

Pros

  • + One search engine for logs, metrics, traces, synthetics and RUM with a single query language
  • + Open source again (AGPLv3/SSPL/ELv2 since August 2024) — self-managed deployments are free
  • + Cheap volume-tiered ingest on serverless: from $0.07/GB (Logs Essentials) with $0.017/GB-month retention
  • + Data tiers and searchable snapshots keep long retention affordable while staying queryable
  • + 50+ cloud regions on AWS, Google Cloud and Azure with FedRAMP High, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS

Cons

  • - Genuine learning curve: query DSL, index lifecycle, shard and mapping decisions
  • - Self-managed operation (JVM tuning, upgrades, snapshots) is a real operational project
  • - Meters run on enriched pre-compression volumes and "as low as" rates are volume-tiered — bills surprise the unprepared
  • - Support priced as a percentage of spend (5% Gold, 10% Platinum, 15% Enterprise on top of consumption)
View full Elastic Observabilityreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.