Namecheap Hosting vs HostMonster
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Namecheap Hosting and HostMonster.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
Namecheap Hosting
0 reviews
2.5/5
HostMonster
0 reviews
Namecheap Hosting is rated higher (3.7 vs 2.5). Namecheap offers shared hosting from $1.98/month with a free domain, free SSL, and cPanel. Popular for bundling domain registration and hosting from a single provider. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.
Namecheap Hosting Shared hosting from $2.28/month (annual/biennial billing) with a free domain for the first year | HostMonster Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $2.28/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | Namecheap domain customers and small-site owners who want hosting, email, SSL, and domains in one account at a low, honest price with no server management. | Existing HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | 20 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 100% | — |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Provo, Utah, US |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | us datacentereu datacenter | us datacenter |
| Visit Namecheap Hosting → | Visit HostMonster → | |
Namecheap Hosting
Pros
- + Entry pricing of $2.28/mo ($26.88/yr) beats most mainstream shared hosts on the advertised rate
- + Datacenter choice at signup: US, Netherlands/UK, and Singapore — with Cloud Storage on EU/Singapore
- + Free SSL, free website migration, and a free first-year domain on annual plans
- + 30-day free trial and a 30-day money-back guarantee for first-time customers
- + cPanel with Softaculous 100+ one-click apps, Imunify360 security, and cPanel 2FA included
Cons
- - Stellar backups are twice-weekly and explicitly not guaranteed; AutoBackup needs Stellar Plus
- - Discounted rates do not apply at renewal — year two costs the higher list rate
- - Stellar caps: 20 GB storage, 3 domains, 300,000 inodes; no published CPU/RAM allocation on any plan
- - Dedicated IP costs $4.00/mo; Supersonic CDN works only with Namecheap's shared nameservers
- - Shared-hosting physics: no root, no dedicated resources, performance depends on neighbors
HostMonster
Pros
- + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
- + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
- + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
- + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus
Cons
- - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
- - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
- - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
- - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
- - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.