NAKIVO vs Restic
A detailed comparison to help you choose between NAKIVO and Restic.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
NAKIVO
0 reviews
4.3/5
Restic
0 reviews
Restic is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.9). NAKIVO is a cost-effective backup and recovery solution for VMware, Hyper-V, Nutanix, and AWS. Instant VM recovery, site-to-site replication, and direct-to-cloud backups. More affordable than Veeam. Restic is a modern backup program that uses content-addressable storage, deduplication, and AES-256 encryption. Backs up to S3, B2, Google Cloud, SFTP, and more. No server required.
NAKIVO VM and cloud backup for SMBs | Restic Fast, secure, encrypted open source backup | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Small and midsize virtualized environments that want enterprise-shaped backup — immutability, replication, site recovery — at transparent published prices without a reseller negotiation. | Developers and sysadmins who want encrypted, deduplicated off-site backups to any storage backend and are comfortable owning key management and operations. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | free tieropen source |
| Visit NAKIVO → | Visit Restic → | |
NAKIVO
Pros
- + Published list pricing — subscription from $1.95 per workload per month, perpetual from $229 per socket
- + Free Edition: 10 workloads plus 5 Microsoft 365 users free for one year with Pro-level features
- + Wide platform coverage including Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV, EC2, physical machines, NAS, and Microsoft 365
- + Immutable storage and encryption in the core editions, not a top-tier add-on
- + Data stays in storage you control; NAKIVO itself holds no customer data
Cons
- - Free Edition expires after one year and limits backup targets to local folders or CIFS/NFS shares
- - Dense license matrix: replication, monitoring, M365, NAS, and Oracle priced as separate lines
- - Essentials editions cap at 6 sockets or 50 workloads per organization
- - Perpetual licenses include only one year of business-hours support; renewals add ongoing cost
- - Self-managed: you run the backup server, monitor jobs, and own the recovery process
Restic
Pros
- + Free BSD-2-Clause software with no paid tier or usage caps
- + Client-side AES-256-CTR encryption with Poly1305 authentication is always on
- + Content-addressed deduplication: incremental backups and multi-machine repositories
- + Native support for S3, B2, GCS, Azure Blob, SFTP, and REST backends; rclone for the rest
- + Openly documented repository format — no vendor lock-in, portable repositories
Cons
- - No password recovery: lose the repository key and the data is gone
- - Command-line only — scheduling, monitoring, and alerting are external
- - Community support only; no SLA or paid support option
- - Repository maintenance (prune, check) requires operational discipline
- - Pre-1.0 version numbering; the API surface can still shift between releases
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.