NAKIVO vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between NAKIVO and Hetzner Storage Box.
NAKIVO VM and cloud backup for SMBs | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (79 reviews) | 4.5 (47 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €3/mo |
| Best for | SMBs running VMs who need enterprise-grade backup at a fraction of Veeam's pricing | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit NAKIVO → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
NAKIVO
Pros
- + More affordable than Veeam for SMBs
- + Free trial with full features
- + Direct-to-cloud backup (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Cons
- - Less market presence than Veeam
- - Limited free tier features
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.