NAKIVO vs Amazon S3
A detailed comparison to help you choose between NAKIVO and Amazon S3.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
NAKIVO
0 reviews
4.1/5
Amazon S3
0 reviews
Amazon S3 is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.9). NAKIVO is a cost-effective backup and recovery solution for VMware, Hyper-V, Nutanix, and AWS. Instant VM recovery, site-to-site replication, and direct-to-cloud backups. More affordable than Veeam. AWS S3 stores and retrieves unlimited amounts of data via a simple web interface. Built for developers, enterprises, and anyone needing reliable, durable cloud storage with pay-as-you-go pricing.
NAKIVO VM and cloud backup for SMBs |  Amazon S3 Scalable object storage for any data size or type | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | pay-as-you-go (per GB-month + per 1,000 requests + retrieval/transfer) |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $0.023/mo |
| Best for | Small and midsize virtualized environments that want enterprise-shaped backup — immutability, replication, site recovery — at transparent published prices without a reseller negotiation. | Teams building on AWS who need durable, API-stable object storage for backups, data lakes, static content and archives — and who value tooling compatibility over the lowest per-GB rate |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 39 AWS regions / 123-124 AZs |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | free tiers3 compatibleapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider |
| Visit NAKIVO → | Visit Amazon S3 → | |
NAKIVO
Pros
- + Published list pricing — subscription from $1.95 per workload per month, perpetual from $229 per socket
- + Free Edition: 10 workloads plus 5 Microsoft 365 users free for one year with Pro-level features
- + Wide platform coverage including Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV, EC2, physical machines, NAS, and Microsoft 365
- + Immutable storage and encryption in the core editions, not a top-tier add-on
- + Data stays in storage you control; NAKIVO itself holds no customer data
Cons
- - Free Edition expires after one year and limits backup targets to local folders or CIFS/NFS shares
- - Dense license matrix: replication, monitoring, M365, NAS, and Oracle priced as separate lines
- - Essentials editions cap at 6 sockets or 50 workloads per organization
- - Perpetual licenses include only one year of business-hours support; renewals add ongoing cost
- - Self-managed: you run the backup server, monitor jobs, and own the recovery process
Amazon S3
Pros
- + Designed for 11 nines durability with cross-AZ replication by default and strong read-after-write consistency
- + The S3 API is the industry standard — code written in 2006 still works, and third-party compatibility is everywhere
- + 23x cost ladder from Standard down to Glacier Deep Archive at $0.00099/GB-month, with lifecycle automation
- + Deepest storage feature set available: versioning, Object Lock, replication, inventory, event notifications, access management
Cons
- - Egress at $0.09/GB and per-request pricing produce surprise bills for chatty or restore-heavy workloads
- - IA and Glacier classes add retrieval fees and latency — the restore path must be priced separately
- - Policy configuration (bucket policies, IAM, Block Public Access, KMS keys) is complex and historically error-prone
- - SLA (99.9%/99.0%) is far below the durability figure — availability and durability are different promises
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.