NAKIVO vs Acronis Cyber Protect
A detailed comparison to help you choose between NAKIVO and Acronis Cyber Protect.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
NAKIVO
0 reviews
3.6/5
Acronis Cyber Protect
0 reviews
NAKIVO is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.6). NAKIVO is a cost-effective backup and recovery solution for VMware, Hyper-V, Nutanix, and AWS. Instant VM recovery, site-to-site replication, and direct-to-cloud backups. More affordable than Veeam. Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup with AI-based malware and ransomware protection. Physical, virtual, and cloud workload backup with 50+ cloud storage destinations.
NAKIVO VM and cloud backup for SMBs | Acronis Cyber Protect Backup with built-in anti-malware protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $85/mo |
| Best for | Small and midsize virtualized environments that want enterprise-shaped backup — immutability, replication, site recovery — at transparent published prices without a reseller negotiation. | IT teams and MSPs running mixed physical, virtual, and Microsoft 365 estates who want backup and endpoint protection consolidated into one console, with control over where backup data is stored. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Acronis-operated sites plus Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure regions (26 data centers per 2021 briefing), incl. Singapore, Japan, Australia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | mobile appteam features |
| Visit NAKIVO → | Visit Acronis Cyber Protect → | |
NAKIVO
Pros
- + Published list pricing — subscription from $1.95 per workload per month, perpetual from $229 per socket
- + Free Edition: 10 workloads plus 5 Microsoft 365 users free for one year with Pro-level features
- + Wide platform coverage including Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV, EC2, physical machines, NAS, and Microsoft 365
- + Immutable storage and encryption in the core editions, not a top-tier add-on
- + Data stays in storage you control; NAKIVO itself holds no customer data
Cons
- - Free Edition expires after one year and limits backup targets to local folders or CIFS/NFS shares
- - Dense license matrix: replication, monitoring, M365, NAS, and Oracle priced as separate lines
- - Essentials editions cap at 6 sockets or 50 workloads per organization
- - Perpetual licenses include only one year of business-hours support; renewals add ongoing cost
- - Self-managed: you run the backup server, monitor jobs, and own the recovery process
Acronis Cyber Protect
Pros
- + Backup and endpoint security (anti-malware, patch management, EDR on Advanced) unified in one agent and console
- + Wide storage flexibility: 26+ Acronis/Google/Azure data centers plus S3, Wasabi, Swift, NFS and on-prem S3-compatible destinations
- + Image-based backups with incremental chains, deduplication, and pre-restore malware scanning fit ransomware recovery planning
- + Coverage across Windows/Linux servers, VMs, workstations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, NAS, and mobile
- + Two licensing models (per-workload and per-GB) let matching your workload shape cut costs significantly
Cons
- - Licensing matrix is genuinely confusing; server protection at roughly $595–$925/server/year dwarfs workstation pricing
- - The combined agent can be heavy on CPU and memory on constrained endpoints
- - Backup-only buyers pay for a security platform they may not want; console complexity reflects five jobs in one product
- - Vendor scale figures and destination counts are marketing claims with limited independent verification
- - Support and SLA terms differ between direct business products and the service-provider platform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.