Skip to content

MCProHosting vs Nodecraft

A detailed comparison to help you choose between MCProHosting and Nodecraft.

Quick Verdict

3.0/5

MCProHosting

0 reviews

4.0/5

Nodecraft

0 reviews

Nodecraft is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.0). MCProHosting (founded 2011) was a leading Minecraft hosting provider until its January 2022 acquisition by Marbis/Nitrado alongside Apex Hosting; it is now merging into the Apex Hosting platform, with all servers being migrated. No independent customer count is verifiable. Nodecraft uses their proprietary NodePanel for managing game servers. Supports Minecraft, Rust, ARK, and other popular games. Switchable servers — change games without losing data.

MCProHosting

MCProHosting

Leading Minecraft hosting since 2011

Nodecraft

Nodecraft

Game server hosting with NodePanel control

Overview
Rating3.0 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom $5.99/moFrom $5.96/mo✓
Best forMinecraft communities and small networks wanting managed, mod-friendly game hosting with human support — evaluated on the merged Apex Hosting platformFriend groups and community admins who want a genuinely usable control panel, multi-game flexibility on one server slot, and a choice of 28+ regions — especially mixed global player bases and non-technical server owners.
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Worldwide: multiple US sites, four in Europe, Asia, South America, Africa, Australia
—
Tags
Tags
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
ddos protectionus datacenter
Visit MCProHosting →Visit Nodecraft →

MCProHosting

Pros

  • + Minecraft-first platform with one-click modpacks, Java+Bedrock switching, full FTP, and 24/7 player-friendly support
  • + Backed by the Nitrado/Marbis group (~50 data centers at acquisition) — genuine infrastructure depth behind the brand
  • + DDoS protection included on all plans, with historical Cloudflare partnership; unlimited storage/slots claims on Minecraft tiers
  • + Entry pricing is competitive on the merged Apex platform (from $5.99–$8/month) with a seven-day trial historically offered

Cons

  • - The brand is being retired — new and existing servers migrate to Apex Hosting; buyers effectively purchase Apex
  • - No published credit-backed uptime SLA; support is 24/7 but without response-time remedies
  • - Spec transparency is thin: per-plan CPU, storage I/O, and network limits are marketing adjectives
  • - Introductory pricing jumps at renewal ($6 to $8; $78 to $104 at the top end); customer-count claims are unverifiable
View full MCProHostingreview →

Nodecraft

Pros

  • + NodePanel is the best control panel in the game-hosting segment: dual-pane files, live console, form-based config, mobile apps
  • + Game swapping across ~59 titles on the same server slot, with saved instances, at no extra cost
  • + 28+ datacenter regions on five continents with a public per-game latency checker
  • + Transparent published price ladder per RAM size with discounts for longer terms and a no-card 24-hour trial
  • + Cloud backups included at no extra fee; automatic on Lite and Pro
  • + AMD Ryzen 9/EPYC hardware with an explicit no-overselling policy and DDoS packet scrubbing

Cons

  • - Support is business-hours US Central, not 24/7 — weak for weekend-evening incidents
  • - Lite servers hibernate when unused; 24/7 reachability requires the Pro line
  • - Premium pricing versus budget hosts like Shockbyte at most RAM tiers
  • - No published contractual uptime SLA (the 99.9% figure is marketing phrasing)
  • - Datacenter relocation is a ticket request rather than self-service
  • - Smaller game catalog than Nitrado; no studio-partnered console exclusives
View full Nodecraftreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.