LinuxServer.io vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between LinuxServer.io and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
4.2/5
LinuxServer.io
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
LinuxServer.io is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.4). LinuxServer.io maintains a library of curated, consistently built Docker container images — 293 repositories on Docker Hub as of October 2026 Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
LinuxServer.io Curated Docker images for self-hosted apps | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Self-hosters, homelab builders and small teams who want a consistent, well-documented container fleet and are prepared to run the infrastructure themselves. | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit LinuxServer.io → | Visit Shuttle → | |
LinuxServer.io
Pros
- + Entirely free and open source — 293 maintained Docker Hub repositories with no premium tier
- + Standardized conventions (shared base images, s6-overlay v3, uniform config layout) across the fleet
- + Automatic rebuilds when upstream apps or dependencies update, with version-linked image tags
- + Documentation for every image at docs.linuxserver.io plus general container guides
- + Long verifiable track record since 2015 with hundreds of millions of pulls
Cons
- - Not a hosting service — you run, patch, back up and secure the infrastructure yourself
- - Community-only support on a "reasonable endeavours" basis: no SLA, no paid escalation
- - Breaking changes between base image versions and deliberately no `latest` tag on base images
- - No vendor accountability or compliance paperwork behind the supply chain
- - Images only — no orchestration, backup or managed-update layer
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.