LinuxServer.io vs Quay.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between LinuxServer.io and Quay.io.
Quick Verdict
4.2/5
LinuxServer.io
0 reviews
3.7/5
Quay.io
0 reviews
LinuxServer.io is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.7). LinuxServer.io maintains a library of curated, consistently built Docker container images — 293 repositories on Docker Hub as of October 2026 Red Hat's hosted container image registry: unlimited free public repos, per-private-repository pricing from $15/month, automatic Clair v4 CVE scanning, robot accounts, teams, and exportable audit logs.
LinuxServer.io Curated Docker images for self-hosted apps | Quay.io Hosted container registry from Red Hat: free public repos, CVE scanning, per-private-repo pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Self-hosters, homelab builders and small teams who want a consistent, well-documented container fleet and are prepared to run the infrastructure themselves. | Open-source projects needing free public image hosting, and Red Hat-centric enterprises wanting managed registries with SSO, robot accounts and audit logging |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen source | free tierteam featuresssoapi access |
| Visit LinuxServer.io → | Visit Quay.io → | |
LinuxServer.io
Pros
- + Entirely free and open source — 293 maintained Docker Hub repositories with no premium tier
- + Standardized conventions (shared base images, s6-overlay v3, uniform config layout) across the fleet
- + Automatic rebuilds when upstream apps or dependencies update, with version-linked image tags
- + Documentation for every image at docs.linuxserver.io plus general container guides
- + Long verifiable track record since 2015 with hundreds of millions of pulls
Cons
- - Not a hosting service — you run, patch, back up and secure the infrastructure yourself
- - Community-only support on a "reasonable endeavours" basis: no SLA, no paid escalation
- - Breaking changes between base image versions and deliberately no `latest` tag on base images
- - No vendor accountability or compliance paperwork behind the supply chain
- - Images only — no orchestration, backup or managed-update layer
Quay.io
Pros
- + Unlimited free public repositories with automatic CVE scanning on every push
- + Public, predictable per-repository pricing from $15/month for 5 private repos
- + Robot accounts, team permissions, SSO and exportable audit logs aimed at compliance teams
- + Decade-plus production track record (launched 2013) with a supported upgrade path to self-managed Red Hat Quay
- + Full API, image rollback, zero-downtime garbage collection and Git build triggers
Cons
- - Per-repository billing punishes micro-repo layouts; large tiers get expensive fast
- - No published uptime SLA for the hosted service
- - Clair does not cover every language ecosystem, and remediation is entirely on the customer
- - Free tier fair-use caps (100 GB storage, 1 TB egress) are enforceable quotas
- - Overlapping product lineup (Quay.io vs Red Hat Quay vs OpenShift Platform Plus) complicates buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.