Linode (Akamai) vs mVPS.it
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Linode (Akamai) and mVPS.it.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Linode (Akamai)
0 reviews
3.1/5
mVPS.it
0 reviews
Linode (Akamai) is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.1). Linode provides managed VPS instances on SSD storage with data centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. Built for developers and small-to-medium businesses needing reliable cloud infrastructure. mVPS.it provides affordable Italian KVM VPS with NVMe storage from €2/month. Italian datacenter with EU data residency and GDPR compliance. Popular in Italian developer community.
Linode (Akamai) High-performance Linux VPS hosting with predictable pricing. | mVPS.it Italian KVM VPS from €2/month | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.1 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From $5/mo | From $2/mo✓ |
| Best for | Small production teams wanting an API-first Linux platform with a real uptime SLA, pooled transfer, managed Kubernetes and databases, and one vendor for compute plus edge delivery. | Italian developers and small businesses wanting cheap domestic KVM hosting with local support — after directly verifying current pricing and terms with the provider. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 1 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 25 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 1 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.99% | — |
| Data-center count | 26 | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €5.00 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €5.00 | — |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | 1,800 | — |
| Disk read (fio) | 800 MB/s | — |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | 14,000 | — |
| Network out | 0.5 Gbps | — |
| Latency (TTFB) | 30 ms | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyIndiaSingaporeJapan+3 | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierhourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsmanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support | nvme storageipv6eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Linode (Akamai) → | Visit mVPS.it → | |
Linode (Akamai)
Pros
- + Published hourly pricing with monthly caps and low egress overage ($0.005/GB)
- + 99.99% compute uptime SLA with pro-rata service credits; 99.9% for other services
- + Complete platform: LKE, managed databases, object storage, NodeBalancers, DNS, GPU
- + Excellent documentation and a well-documented REST API, CLI, and Terraform support
- + 25+ core data centers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and South America
Cons
- - Entry price-performance is not class-leading (our Nanode benchmark: CPU 1,800 at €5/mo)
- - Backups, snapshots, and managed databases are all paid add-ons
- - Product surface is fragmenting as Akamai folds Linode into its enterprise strategy
- - Service availability varies by region (Backups are core-regions-only)
- - Shared entry plans run on explicitly legacy hardware
mVPS.it
Pros
- + Budget pricing in the Italian market — entry VPS recorded at €2 per month with KVM and NVMe
- + Italian-market focus: domestic positioning, Italian-language support, data residency angle for GDPR-sensitive work
- + Plain, modern VPS shape (KVM, NVMe, root access) without add-on clutter
- + Small local provider — direct access to the team rather than tiered support queues
Cons
- - Entire vendor site is password-protected as of October 2026 — pricing, specs, and terms cannot be verified
- - No Internet Archive history, no third-party reviews, no aggregator listings for this provider
- - No published SLA, uptime record, or our own benchmark data; IPv6 status is contradictory in our records
- - Small domestic operator: limited English presence and unproven capacity for critical workloads
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.