Latitude.sh vs phoenixNAP
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Latitude.sh and phoenixNAP.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
0 reviews
3.9/5
phoenixNAP
0 reviews
phoenixNAP is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support. phoenixNAP offers on-demand bare metal servers, colocation, and IaaS in Phoenix, Ashburn, Atlanta, Amsterdam, and Singapore. HIPAA-compliant infrastructure available. From $100/month.
Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | phoenixNAP Bare metal cloud in North America and Europe | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From $69/mo | From $38.81/mo✓ |
| Best for | Teams needing dedicated hardware with automated deployment in specific cities — especially Latin America — for latency-sensitive or AI workloads, with their own ops function. | Teams that need dedicated-server performance with cloud-style hourly provisioning — CI/CD fleets, game servers, database nodes, and Kubernetes on bare metal in the US, EU, or Singapore |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 12 vCPU✓ | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | 32 GB✓ | 16 GB |
| Storage | 800 GB✓ | 480 GB |
| Bandwidth | 20 TB/mo✓ | 15 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 99.5% | 100%✓ |
| Data-center count | 23✓ | 6 |
| €/vCPU/mo | €5.75✓ | €9.70 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €2.16✓ | €2.43 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | [US x6, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney] | Phoenix, Ashburn, Chicago, Seattle, Amsterdam, Singapore |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi access |
| Visit Latitude.sh → | Visit phoenixNAP → | |
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Real bare metal with cloud-style API/Terraform provisioning in minutes
- + Published price list including GPU nodes (1x H100 at $1.68/hr on-demand)
- + 20 TB free outbound traffic per server, unmetered inbound
- + Latin American sites (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago) few competitors match
- + Megaport backing and a $594M 2026 raise aimed at AI inference capacity
Cons
- - Unmanaged — no OS administration, and backups are not included
- - Published SLA is only 99.5% for bare-metal power/uplink and VM instances
- - Per-site stock limits; popular plans can exist in only one or two locations
- - Regional pricing differences (LATAM/APAC cost more than the US price)
- - Product direction in flux after the 2025 Megaport merger and AI pivot
phoenixNAP
Pros
- + Dedicated physical hardware provisioned in about a minute via API, CLI, or Terraform
- + Transparent pricing: hourly billing, published per-instance rates, $0.01/GB bandwidth overage
- + 15 TB bandwidth and 20 Gbps DDoS protection included; 20/50 Gbps bonded network ports
- + Network depth: BYO IPv4/IPv6, BGP local and global, Anycast, Netris VPC-like networking
- + Concrete SLAs — 100% power/network target with service credits, defined hardware replacement terms
Cons
- - Only six BMC deployment locations despite a larger company network footprint
- - Entry s0.d1.small runs a Haswell-era Xeon E3-1240v3; modern instances cost several times more
- - No snapshots, no included backups, no resizing — scaling means redeploying
- - Public IPv4 allocations billed separately and reserved instances keep billing after deletion
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.