Latitude.sh vs Cherry Servers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Latitude.sh and Cherry Servers.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
51 reviews
4.8/5
Cherry Servers
383 reviews
Cherry Servers is rated higher (4.8 vs 3.8). Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support. Cherry Servers offers dedicated bare metal and cloud VPS from Vilnius, Lithuania and Amsterdam, Netherlands. API-driven infrastructure with hourly billing and GDPR-compliant EU hosting.
Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | Cherry Servers Lithuanian bare metal and cloud at EU pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (51 reviews) | 4.8 (383 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €60/mo | From €6/mo✓ |
| Best for | Companies needing bare metal presence in Latin America alongside global locations | EU developers wanting affordable bare metal or VPS with hourly billing and full API control |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacentergdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit Latitude.sh → | Visit Cherry Servers → | |
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Latin American datacenter presence — unique
- + Sub-5-minute deployment
- + Kubernetes and Docker support
Cons
- - Newer provider — smaller track record
- - Limited to specific cities
Cherry Servers
Pros
- + EU bare metal at competitive pricing
- + Hourly billing with API access
- + Lithuanian and Amsterdam locations
Cons
- - Small EU provider
- - Limited APAC presence
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.