Latitude.sh vs Cherry Servers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Latitude.sh and Cherry Servers.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
0 reviews
4.0/5
Cherry Servers
0 reviews
Cherry Servers is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support. Lithuanian provider of bare-metal dedicated servers and cloud VPS in Europe, the US and Singapore, with hourly or monthly billing. Cloud VPS from about $3.24 per month.
Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | Cherry Servers Bare-metal & cloud servers | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | From $69/mo | From $3.24/mo✓ |
| Best for | Teams needing dedicated hardware with automated deployment in specific cities — especially Latin America — for latency-sensitive or AI workloads, with their own ops function. | Developers and teams needing customizable bare-metal and cloud VPS with hourly billing, generous egress, and EU data residency |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 12 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 32 GB | — |
| Storage | 800 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 20 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.5% | 99.97%✓ |
| Data-center count | 23✓ | 7 |
| €/vCPU/mo | €5.75 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €2.16 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | [US x6, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney] | Lithuania, Amsterdam, Chicago, Singapore, Stockholm, Frankfurt, Tokyo |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support | — |
| Visit Latitude.sh → | ||
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Real bare metal with cloud-style API/Terraform provisioning in minutes
- + Published price list including GPU nodes (1x H100 at $1.68/hr on-demand)
- + 20 TB free outbound traffic per server, unmetered inbound
- + Latin American sites (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago) few competitors match
- + Megaport backing and a $594M 2026 raise aimed at AI inference capacity
Cons
- - Unmanaged — no OS administration, and backups are not included
- - Published SLA is only 99.5% for bare-metal power/uplink and VM instances
- - Per-site stock limits; popular plans can exist in only one or two locations
- - Regional pricing differences (LATAM/APAC cost more than the US price)
- - Product direction in flux after the 2025 Megaport merger and AI pivot
Cherry Servers
Pros
- + Low entry pricing: Cloud VPS from $3.24-3.51/mo, custom dedicated from $0.098/hr, with hourly billing
- + Up to 100 TB free egress per dedicated server; extra traffic from €0.50/TB — friendly to bandwidth-heavy workloads
- + 99.97% financially backed uptime SLA and default DDoS protection at no extra cost
- + Bare metal breadth: instant and fully custom builds up to 128 cores / 1152 GB RAM with optional GPUs
- + Seven locations across EU, US, and Asia; personal account manager and 24/7 chat for every customer
Cons
- - No managed Kubernetes, no S3-compatible object storage, no hyperscaler service ecosystem
- - Mid-sized provider (~60 staff); support depth beyond chat and account management is limited
- - Product pages are inconsistent (region counts, $3.24 vs $3.51 entry price) — the configurator is ground truth
- - Wide plan menu (spot, outlet, instant, custom, fixed-term vs on-demand) makes comparison effortful
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.