LAMBDANET vs Psychz Networks
A detailed comparison to help you choose between LAMBDANET and Psychz Networks.
Quick Verdict
2.4/5
LAMBDANET
0 reviews
3.6/5
Psychz Networks
0 reviews
Psychz Networks is rated higher (3.6 vs 2.4). LAMBDANET is a German carrier operating its own nationwide fiber network. Dedicated servers, colocation, and cloud services. Strong BGP routing and redundancy for German businesses needing carrier-grade infrastructure. 16 cities (US: Los Angeles, Ashburn, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta; EU: Amsterdam, London, Barcelona; plus Moscow, Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei, Mumbai, Sydney, Sao Paulo, Johannesburg); DDoS mitigation packages up to 500 Gbps with 2-20 Gbps bundled free per dedicated server
LAMBDANET German carrier-grade dedicated servers | Psychz Networks DDoS-protected bare metal, VPS, and colocation in 16 cities across the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.4 (0 reviews) | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available | From $4/mo |
| Best for | German enterprises buying carrier-grade fiber, IP transit, or colocation in the metros euNetworks covers — not buyers of single dedicated servers. | Gaming, streaming, and media operators needing DDoS-heavy infrastructure or unusual reach (South America, Africa, South Asia), and anyone who wants a fully priced catalogue with hourly testing before committing. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Storage | — | 50 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | 18✓ | 16 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €2.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €1.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | [18 euNetworks colocation/interconnection sites across Germany, Amsterdam, Dublin] | Los Angeles, Ashburn, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta, Amsterdam, London, Barcelona, Moscow, Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei, Mumbai, Sydney, Sao Paulo, Johannesburg |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacentergdpr compliantprivate networking | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenterwindows available |
| Visit LAMBDANET → | Visit Psychz Networks → | |
LAMBDANET
Pros
- + Own German city fiber networks plus long-haul European backbone (AS13237)
- + Native IPv6 and transparent peering policy with a public looking glass
- + Continuous backbone operation since January 2000 through multiple ownership changes
- + Colocation in around 18 facilities across German metros, Amsterdam and Dublin
- + Carrier-grade contractual SLAs per circuit for bandwidth products
Cons
- - No self-serve dedicated servers or VPS — the listed hosting product is not sold anymore
- - No public pricing of any kind; everything is sales-quoted on contract
- - No published uptime SLA percentage or product documentation for hosting
- - Coverage concentrated in Germany; nothing in North America or Asia
- - Ownership changes (3U 2004, euNetworks 2011) require reading current entity terms
Psychz Networks
Pros
- + Sixteen cities on four continents — Johannesburg, Sao Paulo, Mumbai, and Moscow on one account, which almost no competitor offers
- + DDoS mitigation is a core competency: bundled filtering on every dedicated server, tiers to 500 Gbps, fourteen scrubbing points, and remote protection via reverse proxy without needing an ASN
- + Public catalogue of 158 priced plans — no quote-form gate; VMs from $4/month and hourly from $0.0011
- + S3-compatible object storage with zero egress charges and immutable object lock included
- + Service commitment with real teeth: 99.9% network uptime and 5% credit per half hour of outage up to a full month's fee
- + Own facilities and network since 2014 (hosting since 2001) — an operating company, not a reseller shell
Cons
- - All payments non-refundable (continuous backup excepted); claims expire after one calendar year; Texas law with California arbitration
- - Usage policy reserves a discretionary takedown right over otherwise legal content; adult-content permission is a 2015 forum answer, not policy
- - Support and provisioning reviews are genuinely mixed despite the 15-minute response promise
- - Bandwidth is 'unmetered' under an unpublished fair-use threshold
- - EU footprint thinner than US/Asia; documentation and control panel are functional rather than polished
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.