Skip to content

LAMBDANET vs Constant (Choopa)

A detailed comparison to help you choose between LAMBDANET and Constant (Choopa).

Quick Verdict

2.4/5

LAMBDANET

0 reviews

3.6/5

Constant (Choopa)

0 reviews

Constant (Choopa) is rated higher (3.6 vs 2.4). LAMBDANET is a German carrier operating its own nationwide fiber network. Dedicated servers, colocation, and cloud services. Strong BGP routing and redundancy for German businesses needing carrier-grade infrastructure. Constant provides dedicated servers with customizable hardware, DDoS protection, and 24/7 support. Built for applications requiring guaranteed resources and low latency.

LAMBDANET

German carrier-grade dedicated servers

Constant (Choopa)

Constant (Choopa)

Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance

Overview
Rating2.4 (0 reviews)3.6 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFrom $120/mo
Best forGerman enterprises buying carrier-grade fiber, IP transit, or colocation in the metros euNetworks covers — not buyers of single dedicated servers.Teams wanting a single API and bill across global regions for mixed VM, bare metal, and GPU capacity, with an SLA strong enough for production
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—4 vCPU
RAM—32 GB
Storage—480 GB
Bandwidth—5 TB/mo
SLA uptime—100%
Data-center count1833✓
€/vCPU/mo—€30.00
€/GB RAM/mo—€3.75
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
[18 euNetworks colocation/interconnection sites across Germany, Amsterdam, Dublin]
33 regions on six continents (list in specs)
Tags
Tags
nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacentergdpr compliantprivate networking
nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit LAMBDANET →Visit Constant (Choopa) →

LAMBDANET

Pros

  • + Own German city fiber networks plus long-haul European backbone (AS13237)
  • + Native IPv6 and transparent peering policy with a public looking glass
  • + Continuous backbone operation since January 2000 through multiple ownership changes
  • + Colocation in around 18 facilities across German metros, Amsterdam and Dublin
  • + Carrier-grade contractual SLAs per circuit for bandwidth products

Cons

  • - No self-serve dedicated servers or VPS — the listed hosting product is not sold anymore
  • - No public pricing of any kind; everything is sales-quoted on contract
  • - No published uptime SLA percentage or product documentation for hosting
  • - Coverage concentrated in Germany; nothing in North America or Asia
  • - Ownership changes (3U 2004, euNetworks 2011) require reading current entity terms
View full LAMBDANETreview →

Constant (Choopa)

Pros

  • + One platform across 33 regions: VMs, bare metal, GPU clusters, storage, managed databases, Kubernetes
  • + Credit-backed 100% uptime SLA covering network and host node — stronger than most rivals on paper
  • + Public, consistent pricing with hourly billing capped at 672 hours/month; mature API, CLI, Terraform support
  • + Real bare metal range from 4-core E3 boxes to 128-core EPYC and 8-way H100/B200 GPU systems
  • + BGP sessions with full tables, BYOIP, IPv6 in every region, free Anycast DNS

Cons

  • - The brand in this listing is retired — Choopa was folded into Vultr in 2022 and no longer sells under its own name
  • - Bare metal entry (~$120/mo) costs more than European specialists for comparable-era hardware
  • - DDoS filtering beyond built-in mitigation is a $10/mo per-instance add-on; snapshots and backups also cost extra
  • - Ticket-based big-platform support rather than the named-account service old Choopa customers knew
  • - Billing edge cases: stopped instances can still bill on some lines, and percentage-based backups add up
View full Constant (Choopa)review →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.