Koyeb vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Koyeb and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Koyeb
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Koyeb is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.4). Koyeb is a developer-friendly serverless platform that deploys apps at the edge globally using just Docker or Git. Supports any language and framework. Free tier for small apps. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
Koyeb Serverless PaaS with global edge deployment | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers and small teams deploying Docker or Git services who want per-second billing, instant global deploys and on-demand GPUs, and who accept platform-change risk after the Mistral acquisition | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Storage | 2 GB✓ | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 7✓ | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.00 | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit Koyeb → | Visit Shuttle → | |
Koyeb
Pros
- + Per-second billing with autoscaling — idle apps cost almost nothing
- + Fully public instance pricing including GPU lineups (L4 to H200/B200)
- + Real free tier: one web service plus a small Postgres database
- + French company and EU jurisdiction; 7 regions across 5 countries
- + Deploy from Git or Docker with multi-region, per-region instance types
Cons
- - Acquired by Mistral AI in February 2026 — roadmap now tied to Mistral Compute
- - Uptime SLA only from the $299/month Scale plan; 24/7 support needs the Business plan
- - No spending limits yet; bandwidth and domain extras priced for future billing
- - Small team and community versus Render, Railway or the hyperscalers
- - Free tier limited to Frankfurt and Washington DC; eco instances to three regions
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.