Koyeb vs Northflank Containers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Koyeb and Northflank Containers.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Koyeb
0 reviews
3.9/5
Northflank Containers
0 reviews
Northflank Containers is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). Koyeb is a developer-friendly serverless platform that deploys apps at the edge globally using just Docker or Git. Supports any language and framework. Free tier for small apps. Northflank provides container deployments with automatic Docker image builds from GitHub, background workers, cron jobs, and secret management. Kubernetes-powered with a developer-friendly interface.
Koyeb Serverless PaaS with global edge deployment | Northflank Containers Container deployments with built-in CI/CD | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers and small teams deploying Docker or Git services who want per-second billing, instant global deploys and on-demand GPUs, and who accept platform-change risk after the Mistral acquisition | Engineering teams wanting Heroku-grade developer experience with Kubernetes-grade control: GitHub-to-deployment pipelines with per-PR previews, multi-cloud deployment including your own VPC, and GPU/AI workloads on the same platform. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 2 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 7 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tiermanaged optionteam featuresapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit Koyeb → | Visit Northflank Containers → | |
Koyeb
Pros
- + Per-second billing with autoscaling — idle apps cost almost nothing
- + Fully public instance pricing including GPU lineups (L4 to H200/B200)
- + Real free tier: one web service plus a small Postgres database
- + French company and EU jurisdiction; 7 regions across 5 countries
- + Deploy from Git or Docker with multi-region, per-region instance types
Cons
- - Acquired by Mistral AI in February 2026 — roadmap now tied to Mistral Compute
- - Uptime SLA only from the $299/month Scale plan; 24/7 support needs the Business plan
- - No spending limits yet; bandwidth and domain extras priced for future billing
- - Small team and community versus Render, Railway or the hyperscalers
- - Free tier limited to Frankfurt and Washington DC; eco instances to three regions
Northflank Containers
Pros
- + Per-second, usage-based pricing with published unit rates and no seat fees
- + Real free Sandbox: 2 services, 2 jobs, 1 database, up to $20/mo resources, always-on compute
- + BYOC runs the platform in your AWS/GCP/Azure/Oracle VPC while you keep your cloud commitments
- + Strong CI/CD: per-PR preview environments, stored builds with rollback, release pipelines
- + GPU workloads (L4/A100/H100), Jupyter, secure code execution, RWX volumes: AI-ready beyond typical PaaS
- + UI, CLI, API, and GitOps control surfaces with RBAC, secrets, and audit-oriented enterprise features
Cons
- - Young company (founded 2019, Series A): less operational track record than incumbents
- - Contractual SLA and 24/7 support are Enterprise-only
- - Storage, IOPS, throughput, egress, and gateway line items stack up on database-heavy architectures
- - Card/payment-method requirement for the free tier conflicts between the pricing page and billing docs
- - Deep platform abstraction means application-level lock-in even with BYOC
- - Documentation is thorough on features but thin on migration patterns and BYOC networking edge cases
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.