Koyeb vs LucidLink
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Koyeb and LucidLink.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Koyeb
0 reviews
4.0/5
LucidLink
0 reviews
LucidLink is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). Koyeb is a developer-friendly serverless platform that deploys apps at the edge globally using just Docker or Git. Supports any language and framework. Free tier for small apps. LucidLink turns S3 object storage into a shared, streaming cloud filesystem for teams working with large files.
Koyeb Serverless PaaS with global edge deployment | LucidLink Cloud file streaming for teams: a shared filesystem on top of S3 object storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $7/mo |
| Best for | Developers and small teams deploying Docker or Git services who want per-second billing, instant global deploys and on-demand GPUs, and who accept platform-change risk after the Mistral acquisition | Creative and production teams (video, audio, VFX, design) with large shared files and distributed members who need one live filesystem without syncing or shipping drives. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 2 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 7 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | — |
| Visit Koyeb → | ||
Koyeb
Pros
- + Per-second billing with autoscaling — idle apps cost almost nothing
- + Fully public instance pricing including GPU lineups (L4 to H200/B200)
- + Real free tier: one web service plus a small Postgres database
- + French company and EU jurisdiction; 7 regions across 5 countries
- + Deploy from Git or Docker with multi-region, per-region instance types
Cons
- - Acquired by Mistral AI in February 2026 — roadmap now tied to Mistral Compute
- - Uptime SLA only from the $299/month Scale plan; 24/7 support needs the Business plan
- - No spending limits yet; bandwidth and domain extras priced for future billing
- - Small team and community versus Render, Railway or the hyperscalers
- - Free tier limited to Frankfurt and Washington DC; eco instances to three regions
LucidLink
Pros
- + Streams large shared files on demand — no full downloads before work starts
- + Zero-knowledge encryption: the vendor cannot read customer content
- + Transparent published per-member pricing with included storage per seat
- + Built on S3, with bring-your-own-S3 on Enterprise for storage-substrate flexibility
- + 30-day free trial without a credit card; desktop, mobile and web clients
- + TeamCache add-on brings cloud files to on-prem users at LAN speed
Cons
- - Storage overage of $7-8 per 100 GB is roughly $70-80 per TB per month — far above raw S3
- - Starter tier is tightly capped: 10 members, 1 filespace, 1 TB, and no snapshot recovery
- - Specialized for file-streaming workloads; wrong shape for databases or block storage
- - No published region list or public uptime SLA outside Enterprise discussions
- - Client and control-plane dependency on a mid-size specialist vendor
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.