KeyCDN vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between KeyCDN and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
KeyCDN
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
KeyCDN is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). KeyCDN is a Swiss CDN provider focusing on privacy and simplicity. From $0.04/GB with a $4/month minimum charge. 60+ data centers in 40+ countries. GDPR-compliant, HTTP/2, and edge rules for customization. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
KeyCDN Swiss CDN from $0.04/GB — privacy-focused | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | From $0.04/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Privacy-conscious developers and EU/Swiss businesses with variable traffic who want flat, all-features-included CDN delivery with pay-as-you-go pricing and dense European coverage. | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | [39 countries across NA, EU, APAC, LATAM, Africa — see specs] | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiereu datacenterus datacenterapac datacentergdpr compliant | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit KeyCDN → | Visit Gcore → | |
KeyCDN
Pros
- + Transparent published usage pricing with tiered rates down to $0.01/GB over 100 TB
- + Every account gets every feature — no enterprise tier gating of purge, TLS, Origin Shield or secure tokens
- + Independent, non-federated Swiss network: 60+ data centers, Tier 1 connectivity, 40 Gbps edge uplinks
- + 14-day trial with no credit card required and free 24/7 support for all customers
- + Strong European PoP density and Swiss/GDPR privacy positioning
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA — no contractual availability commitment or service credits
- - No ongoing free tier, and a $4/month minimum charge plus $49 minimum payment
- - Thinner coverage in Africa, South Asia and parts of Latin America than hyperscale CDNs
- - Add-on fees (extra zones, syslog forwarding, image processing, Push storage) can exceed delivery cost
- - Small independent vendor: narrower integration ecosystem and no edge compute platform
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.