Skip to content

iPage vs HostMonster

A detailed comparison to help you choose between iPage and HostMonster.

Quick Verdict

2.2/5

iPage

0 reviews

2.5/5

HostMonster

0 reviews

HostMonster is rated higher (2.5 vs 2.2). iPage is an EIG/Newfold Digital brand offering very cheap shared hosting. Very simple interface designed for complete beginners. Free domain, SSL, and unlimited disk on annual plans. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.

iPage

iPage

Budget hosting from $1.99/month

HostMonster

HostMonster

Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently

Overview
Rating2.2 (0 reviews)2.5 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom $1.99/moFree tier available
Best forNobody choosing a host today; the only remaining audience is existing customers deciding whether to ride out the Network Solutions migration or move — and we recommend movingExisting HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Waltham (MA, US), Boston (MA, US)
Provo, Utah, US
Tags
Tags
us datacenter
us datacenter
Visit iPage →Visit HostMonster →

iPage

Pros

  • + Historically among the cheapest entry points ($1.99/mo on 3-year terms) with free domain and SSL
  • + Simple single-plan shared product that was easy for complete beginners
  • + 30-day money-back guarantee on new accounts
  • + Existing accounts keep running through the Network Solutions migration with no forced action
  • + Long operating history (since 1998) with a straightforward site builder for non-technical users

Cons

  • - Brand is being absorbed into Network Solutions — iPage is effectively closed to new business as a standalone host
  • - Renewal jumps ~5.5x ($1.99 -> $10.99/mo), and third-party 3-year TCO beats less-cheaper but faster rivals
  • - Dated infrastructure: old Xeon hardware, Apache, PHP 8.1 ceiling, no NVMe, ~380ms TTFB in third-party tests
  • - Third-party 12-month monitoring recorded 99.71% uptime — below the advertised 99.9% guarantee
  • - Proprietary control panel (migration trap), no free automatic backups, US-only data centers
View full iPagereview →

HostMonster

Pros

  • + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
  • + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
  • + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
  • + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus

Cons

  • - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
  • - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
  • - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
  • - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
  • - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
View full HostMonsterreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.