Inngest vs Cloudflare Workers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Inngest and Cloudflare Workers.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Inngest
0 reviews
4.3/5
Cloudflare Workers
0 reviews
Cloudflare Workers is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.9). Inngest is a developer platform for building reliable event-driven background functions. Automatic retries, delays, fan-out, and step functions. Works with Next.js, Node.js, Go, and Python. Run JavaScript, Python, and Rust functions at the edge with sub-millisecond latency. Ideal for APIs, middleware, and full-stack applications needing global distribution.
Inngest Event-driven functions with automatic retries | Cloudflare Workers Deploy serverless code globally on Cloudflare's edge network | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Full-stack and product developers adding reliable background jobs, webhooks, scheduled tasks, or multi-step AI agent workflows to existing apps without building queue infrastructure | Latency-sensitive APIs, middleware, edge rendering and full-stack applications that want global deployment with no infrastructure to run — especially teams already using Cloudflare's storage and CDN products. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 10 vCPU |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 100% |
| Data-center count | — | 330 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Global — 300+ cities |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceapi access | free tierddos protectionipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit Inngest → | Visit Cloudflare Workers → | |
Inngest
Pros
- + Real free tier ($0, no card, 50k executions) that pauses at quota instead of billing overage
- + Durable execution without operating queues, brokers, or worker fleets — code stays on your infra
- + Open-source, self-hostable server as an exit path from vendor lock-in
- + Strong SDK coverage (TypeScript, Python, Go, Kotlin) and developer tooling (dev server, replay, traces)
- + Per-run economics are excellent at volume on Pro ($99/mo for 1M executions)
Cons
- - Execution billing counts every step (runs x steps+1), so step-heavy workflows burn quota fast
- - Steep free-to-Pro jump to $99/mo once free caps (5 concurrent steps, 24h traces) bite
- - No published uptime SLA below enterprise agreements
- - Not infrastructure — you still need somewhere to run your code
- - Plan walls on workspaces, apps, and trace retention push growing teams upward quickly
Cloudflare Workers
Pros
- + No cold starts: V8 isolates start in microseconds at 330+ locations
- + CPU-time billing with a genuinely usable free tier (100k requests/day)
- + No egress or bandwidth charges on any plan
- + Storage stack (KV, D1, Durable Objects, R2) binds declaratively and stays in-network
- + Strong docs: pricing and limits pages are explicit and example-driven
Cons
- - CPU time caps exclude compute-heavy and long-running workloads
- - Real vendor lock-in through Durable Objects, bindings and deployment model
- - KV writes ($5.00/M) and Durable Objects duration billing surprise stateful designs
- - Conceptual shift for teams used to container-based serverless
- - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.