Skip to content

Imperva vs Sucuri

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Imperva and Sucuri.

Quick Verdict

3.2/5

Imperva

0 reviews

3.7/5

Sucuri

0 reviews

Sucuri is rated higher (3.7 vs 3.2). Imperva provides enterprise WAF, DDoS protection, bot management, and API security, now part of Thales. 13 Tbps DDoS scrubbing capacity across 61 data centers. Quote-based pricing. GoDaddy-owned website security platform (founded 2010): cloud WAF, Anycast CDN, DDoS mitigation, and unlimited human malware cleanups. Firewall-only plans from $9.99/mo; security platform plans from $229/yr. Popular with WordPress sites and small businesses.

Imperva

Imperva

Enterprise WAF and DDoS protection

Sucuri

Sucuri

Website firewall and malware cleanup service

Overview
Rating3.2 (0 reviews)3.7 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFrom $9.99/mo
Best forEnterprises in financial services, large e-commerce, and regulated industries needing proven WAF, bot management, and volumetric DDoS protection with contractual SLAsWordPress and small-business site owners who want a cloud firewall plus guaranteed professional malware cleanup from one vendor, and value recovery speed enough to pay for a faster SLA tier.
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
ddos protectionteam featuressso
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter
Visit Imperva →Visit Sucuri →

Imperva

Pros

  • + 13 Tbps scrubbing capacity across 61 DDoS-resilient data centers with full security stack at every PoP
  • + Contractual 3-second mitigation SLA for Layer 3 and 4 DDoS attacks
  • + Deep portfolio: WAF, bot management, API security, client-side protection, and data-security analytics
  • + Thales ownership and a 20+ year track record suit regulated industries and long procurement cycles
  • + 260+ built-in integrations with SIEM, Splunk, CMDB, and SOAR tooling

Cons

  • - Quote-only pricing with no free tier or public price list
  • - Configuration complexity requires real security-engineering effort to tune
  • - Console sprawl and legacy/current branding overlap after years of product accretion
  • - Module-by-module packaging makes full-platform cost hard to predict
  • - Overkill for small deployments that a CDN-tier WAF would cover
View full Impervareview →

Sucuri

Pros

  • + Unlimited manual malware cleanups by real analysts on every platform plan
  • + WAF, DDoS mitigation (layers 3/4/7), and CDN in one proxy — one DNS change to activate
  • + Clear, published plan economics: SLA times and scan frequencies per tier
  • + Virtual patching covers unpatched CMS installs while you update
  • + 24/7/365 ticket support and a 30-day money-back guarantee

Cons

  • - Best feature (human cleanup) engages after you are already breached
  • - Response SLAs are tier-gated: 30-hour estimate on the entry plan, and it is not an uptime SLA
  • - CDN performance is a convenience layer, not a match for dedicated CDN networks
  • - No free tier; firewall-only plans exclude the cleanup service
  • - GoDaddy ownership adds portfolio-strategy questions for a trust-critical purchase
View full Sucurireview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.