Imperva vs AWS WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Imperva and AWS WAF.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Imperva
66 reviews
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.0). Imperva provides enterprise-grade WAF, DDoS protection, bot management, and API security. Used by financial services and Fortune 500. 6Tbps DDoS scrubbing capacity. AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield.
Imperva Enterprise WAF and DDoS protection |  AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (66 reviews) | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From €500/mo | From €5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Enterprise companies in financial services needing best-in-class WAF and bot management | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectionteam featuressso | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Imperva → | Visit AWS WAF → | |
Imperva
Pros
- + Enterprise-grade WAF with bot management
- + 6Tbps DDoS capacity
- + Advanced API security
Cons
- - Very expensive — enterprise pricing only
- - Complex to configure for maximum protection
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.