Skip to content

Imperva vs Akamai

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Imperva and Akamai.

Quick Verdict

3.2/5

Imperva

0 reviews

4.1/5

Akamai

0 reviews

Akamai is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.2). Imperva provides enterprise WAF, DDoS protection, bot management, and API security, now part of Thales. 13 Tbps DDoS scrubbing capacity across 61 data centers. Quote-based pricing. Akamai invented the CDN industry in 1998. 340,000+ servers in 130+ countries. Enterprise CDN, edge security, and media delivery at massive scale. Acquired Linode for cloud compute.

Imperva

Imperva

Enterprise WAF and DDoS protection

Akamai

Akamai

The original CDN — 4,400+ edge PoPs across 130+ countries

Overview
Rating3.2 (0 reviews)4.1 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forEnterprises in financial services, large e-commerce, and regulated industries needing proven WAF, bot management, and volumetric DDoS protection with contractual SLAsGlobal media and streaming platforms, gaming backends, and attack-prone enterprises that need the largest edge footprint and top-tier DDoS scrubbing under enterprise contracts
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
ddos protectionteam featuressso
ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Imperva →Visit Akamai →

Imperva

Pros

  • + 13 Tbps scrubbing capacity across 61 DDoS-resilient data centers with full security stack at every PoP
  • + Contractual 3-second mitigation SLA for Layer 3 and 4 DDoS attacks
  • + Deep portfolio: WAF, bot management, API security, client-side protection, and data-security analytics
  • + Thales ownership and a 20+ year track record suit regulated industries and long procurement cycles
  • + 260+ built-in integrations with SIEM, Splunk, CMDB, and SOAR tooling

Cons

  • - Quote-only pricing with no free tier or public price list
  • - Configuration complexity requires real security-engineering effort to tune
  • - Console sprawl and legacy/current branding overlap after years of product accretion
  • - Module-by-module packaging makes full-platform cost hard to predict
  • - Overkill for small deployments that a CDN-tier WAF would cover
View full Impervareview →

Akamai

Pros

  • + Unmatched edge reach: 4,400+ PoPs across 130+ countries and 1,200+ networks
  • + Prolexic DDoS scrubbing is the industry reference: 20+ Tbps dedicated capacity, zero-second mitigation, 100% platform availability SLA
  • + Two decades-plus of delivery track record at the largest media and event scale
  • + Aggressive egress pricing on the Akamai Cloud compute side, inherited from the Linode acquisition
  • + Edge compute (EdgeWorkers, Functions) plus core and distributed compute regions under one network

Cons

  • - No public pricing — quote-based enterprise procurement with real sales-cycle overhead
  • - Not an option for individuals, small businesses, or anyone who wants self-serve onboarding
  • - Dense, modular product catalog that is easy to over-buy or misconfigure
  • - Volume commitments can make traffic overruns expensive
  • - Compute breadth is thin compared with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud
View full Akamaireview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.