Imgix vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Imgix and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
Imgix
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.7). CDN and image processing platform that optimizes, transforms, and delivers images globally. For developers and teams needing dynamic image resizing, format conversion, and fast delivery. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
 Imgix Real-time image optimization and delivery at scale | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | From $20.83/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | E-commerce, media, and product teams serving high volumes of images who need dynamic resizing and a mature delivery stack without maintaining image-processing infrastructure | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | api access | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Imgix → | Visit Gcore → | |
Imgix
Pros
- + Own global CDN with 96 points of presence and a published 99.99% uptime figure
- + Fifteen years of image-processing depth — long-tail edge cases are handled well
- + Sources stay in your own storage (S3, GCS, web folders); no asset migration required
- + Clear plan ladder with credit allowances and media/delivery caps spelled out per tier
- + SOC 2 compliant, TLS included, public status page, Enterprise SLAs and SSO
Cons
- - Credit-based metering obscures real per-GB costs and punishes viral traffic twice
- - No free tier — only a 30-day trial; month-to-month costs about 17% more
- - Light on DAM and collaboration features compared with ImageKit and Cloudinary
- - Parallel media and delivery caps force tier jumps when you grow in one dimension
- - URL-parameter adoption creates real switching costs despite portable sources
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.