ImageKit.io vs StackPath
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ImageKit.io and StackPath.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
ImageKit.io
0 reviews
1.0/5
StackPath
0 reviews
ImageKit.io is rated higher (3.9 vs 1.0). ImageKit.io delivers optimized images globally through its CDN with on-the-fly transformations. Built for developers who need fast image delivery without manual optimization workflows. Defunct edge platform. StackPath closed all products and began liquidating assets in June 2024; its CDN line had already ceased in November 2023. Not purchasable.
 ImageKit.io Real-time image optimization and CDN for faster web performance | StackPath Defunct edge platform (closed 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 1.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | discontinued |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Development and marketing teams managing product imagery, user-generated content, or large media libraries who want automated optimization and DAM without dedicated image engineering | Nobody in 2026 — StackPath was dissolved in June 2024. For the same CDN + WAF + DDoS + edge compute combination, look at Cloudflare, Fastly, or Akamai. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit ImageKit.io → | Visit StackPath → | |
ImageKit.io
Pros
- + Transformations are not billed — pricing runs on bandwidth, storage, video units, extension units, seats, and purges
- + Genuine free tier with the full processing feature surface (20 GB bandwidth, 3 GB DAM storage)
- + Amazon CloudFront delivery with seven AWS processing regions and bring-your-own-CDN support
- + Storage-agnostic origins: S3, GCS, Azure Blob, or the built-in media library
- + Broad AI operation set (background removal, upscaling, generative fill, auto-tagging) plus DAM in one platform
Cons
- - Uptime commitment percentage is defined in the terms but not publicly legible
- - Video and extension "units" make bill forecasting hard before a test month
- - Free and Lite bandwidth caps (20 GB / 40 GB) are easy to hit on a busy site
- - Collaboration and DAM governance features are gated at Pro ($89/month) and Enterprise
- - No independent performance record; edge-reach figures are CloudFront's, not ImageKit's
StackPath
Pros
- + Historically bundled CDN, WAF, DDoS, and edge compute under one account
- + Large final footprint (73 edge locations across 43 metro markets, company's own count)
- + Edge compute with VMs and containers in the same PoPs as content delivery
- + Backing from Juniper, Cox, and ABRY gave it enterprise credibility while it lasted
Cons
- - Company defunct since June 2024 — all products closed, assets liquidated, support switched off
- - CDN business sold to Akamai in 2023; customers stranded through three platform migrations in five years
- - Conflicting PoP counts across its own marketing pages (45 / 50+ / 73)
- - Any pricing or feature list found online is historical, not purchasable
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.