ImageKit.io vs jsDelivr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ImageKit.io and jsDelivr.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
ImageKit.io
0 reviews
4.3/5
jsDelivr
0 reviews
jsDelivr is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.9). ImageKit.io delivers optimized images globally through its CDN with on-the-fly transformations. Built for developers who need fast image delivery without manual optimization workflows. jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source npm and GitHub packages. Serve any npm package from the CDN with automatic versioning. Used by millions of websites. No setup required.
 ImageKit.io Real-time image optimization and CDN for faster web performance | jsDelivr Free CDN for open source JavaScript packages | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Development and marketing teams managing product imagery, user-generated content, or large media libraries who want automated optimization and DAM without dedicated image engineering | Websites and developers serving open source JavaScript, CSS, and library assets from npm, GitHub, or WordPress plugins via CDN |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Global multi-CDN: Cloudflare, Fastly, Bunny, Gcore plus custom servers |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen source |
| Visit ImageKit.io → | Visit jsDelivr → | |
ImageKit.io
Pros
- + Transformations are not billed — pricing runs on bandwidth, storage, video units, extension units, seats, and purges
- + Genuine free tier with the full processing feature surface (20 GB bandwidth, 3 GB DAM storage)
- + Amazon CloudFront delivery with seven AWS processing regions and bring-your-own-CDN support
- + Storage-agnostic origins: S3, GCS, Azure Blob, or the built-in media library
- + Broad AI operation set (background removal, upscaling, generative fill, auto-tagging) plus DAM in one platform
Cons
- - Uptime commitment percentage is defined in the terms but not publicly legible
- - Video and extension "units" make bill forecasting hard before a test month
- - Free and Lite bandwidth caps (20 GB / 40 GB) are easy to hit on a busy site
- - Collaboration and DAM governance features are gated at Pro ($89/month) and Enterprise
- - No independent performance record; edge-reach figures are CloudFront's, not ImageKit's
jsDelivr
Pros
- + Completely free with no bandwidth limits or premium tiers
- + Multi-CDN delivery (Cloudflare, Fastly, Bunny, Gcore) with 540+ points of presence
- + Proven at very large scale — hundreds of billions of requests per month
- + Version pinning, semver ranges, purge API, stats API, ESM support (esm.run)
- + Absorbed BootstrapCDN, RawGit, and OSSCDN — broad legacy URL coverage
Cons
- - No SLA, no support contract, no uptime guarantee — offered as-is
- - Open source files only (npm, GitHub, WordPress plugins); not for private application assets
- - Upstream package removals or policy decisions can take files offline
- - Sponsorship-funded and small-team operated; support is best-effort
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.