Skip to content

IBM Cloud vs Constant (Choopa)

A detailed comparison to help you choose between IBM Cloud and Constant (Choopa).

Quick Verdict

3.2/5

IBM Cloud

0 reviews

3.6/5

Constant (Choopa)

0 reviews

Constant (Choopa) is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.2). IBM Cloud offers Virtual Server Instances, Kubernetes, bare metal, and strong mainframe (Z-series) integration. Used by financial services needing IBM Z connectivity. 60+ global datacenters. Constant provides dedicated servers with customizable hardware, DDoS protection, and 24/7 support. Built for applications requiring guaranteed resources and low latency.

IBM Cloud

IBM Cloud

Enterprise cloud with mainframe integration

Constant (Choopa)

Constant (Choopa)

Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance

Overview
Rating3.2 (0 reviews)3.6 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumpaid
Starting priceFree tier available✓From $120/mo
Best forEnterprises anchored to IBM Z, Power, SAP, or Oracle estates, and regulated financial services teams needing certification coverage and mainframe adjacencyTeams wanting a single API and bill across global regions for mixed VM, bare metal, and GPU capacity, with an SLA strong enough for production
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—4 vCPU
RAM—32 GB
Storage—480 GB
Bandwidth—5 TB/mo
SLA uptime—100%
Data-center count—33
€/vCPU/mo—€30.00
€/GB RAM/mo—€3.75
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier✓
Data-center locations
Regions—
33 regions on six continents (list in specs)
Tags
Tags
free tierhourly billinggpu availableeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit IBM Cloud →Visit Constant (Choopa) →

IBM Cloud

Pros

  • + IBM Z (mainframe) and Power Virtual Server integration that no commodity host offers
  • + Credit-backed 99.99% SLA on Virtual Server for VPC with multizone regions of three or more separate data centers
  • + Ten instance profile families including Confidential Computing and storage-optimized shapes
  • + Bare metal, spot-style transient servers, reserved capacity, and hourly billing in one contract surface
  • + Free Lite account plus generous rotating new-account credits for trials

Cons

  • - Two overlapping platforms (Classic and VPC) with different APIs, images, and pricing
  • - Roughly 10x the monthly cost of value leaders for a comparable 2-vCPU VM
  • - DDoS scrubbing is a separate paid product (Cloud Internet Services)
  • - Metered extras (boot volume, egress, load balancers) make cost prediction work
  • - Base support tier is not the enterprise support IBM's reputation implies
View full IBM Cloudreview →

Constant (Choopa)

Pros

  • + One platform across 33 regions: VMs, bare metal, GPU clusters, storage, managed databases, Kubernetes
  • + Credit-backed 100% uptime SLA covering network and host node — stronger than most rivals on paper
  • + Public, consistent pricing with hourly billing capped at 672 hours/month; mature API, CLI, Terraform support
  • + Real bare metal range from 4-core E3 boxes to 128-core EPYC and 8-way H100/B200 GPU systems
  • + BGP sessions with full tables, BYOIP, IPv6 in every region, free Anycast DNS

Cons

  • - The brand in this listing is retired — Choopa was folded into Vultr in 2022 and no longer sells under its own name
  • - Bare metal entry (~$120/mo) costs more than European specialists for comparable-era hardware
  • - DDoS filtering beyond built-in mitigation is a $10/mo per-instance add-on; snapshots and backups also cost extra
  • - Ticket-based big-platform support rather than the named-account service old Choopa customers knew
  • - Billing edge cases: stopped instances can still bill on some lines, and percentage-based backups add up
View full Constant (Choopa)review →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.