DataPacket vs Latitude.sh
A detailed comparison to help you choose between DataPacket and Latitude.sh.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
DataPacket
0 reviews
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
0 reviews
DataPacket is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). DataPacket offers dedicated servers and bare metal across 35 datacenter locations globally. Custom hardware, BGP sessions available, and 100Gbps uplinks on premium servers. Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support.
DataPacket Global bare metal with 67 datacenter locations | Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $240/mo | From $69/mo✓ |
| Best for | Network-intensive operators — CDNs, video and streaming platforms, VPN providers, game-traffic and mirror hosts — whose costs are driven by bandwidth volume | Teams needing dedicated hardware with automated deployment in specific cities — especially Latin America — for latency-sensitive or AI workloads, with their own ops function. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 12 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 32 GB |
| Storage | — | 800 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 20 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.5% |
| Data-center count | 67✓ | 23 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.75 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €2.16 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | [US x6, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney] |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit DataPacket → | Visit Latitude.sh → | |
DataPacket
Pros
- + Unshared 50-200 Gbps uplinks with unmetered traffic and no egress billing
- + 67 data centre locations on six continents on a private 330+ Tbps backbone
- + Current-generation AMD EPYC + NVMe + DDR5 hardware, in-stock machines deploy in about a day
- + DDoS Shield included, one IPv4 free per server, free /64 IPv6 blocks
- + Network-heavy reference customers (Discord, bunny.net, Nodecraft, Livepeer) validate traffic-spike resilience
Cons
- - $240/mo entry price excludes small and hobby workloads entirely
- - No cloud platform services: no snapshots, managed databases or autoscaling groups
- - Custom hardware, BYO IP and top uplink tiers are quote-only through sales
- - Thin third-party documentation and community content outside the company's own support
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Real bare metal with cloud-style API/Terraform provisioning in minutes
- + Published price list including GPU nodes (1x H100 at $1.68/hr on-demand)
- + 20 TB free outbound traffic per server, unmetered inbound
- + Latin American sites (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago) few competitors match
- + Megaport backing and a $594M 2026 raise aimed at AI inference capacity
Cons
- - Unmanaged — no OS administration, and backups are not included
- - Published SLA is only 99.5% for bare-metal power/uplink and VM instances
- - Per-site stock limits; popular plans can exist in only one or two locations
- - Regional pricing differences (LATAM/APAC cost more than the US price)
- - Product direction in flux after the 2025 Megaport merger and AI pivot
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.