DataPacket vs Constant (Choopa)
A detailed comparison to help you choose between DataPacket and Constant (Choopa).
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
DataPacket
0 reviews
3.6/5
Constant (Choopa)
0 reviews
DataPacket is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.6). DataPacket offers dedicated servers and bare metal across 35 datacenter locations globally. Custom hardware, BGP sessions available, and 100Gbps uplinks on premium servers. Constant provides dedicated servers with customizable hardware, DDoS protection, and 24/7 support. Built for applications requiring guaranteed resources and low latency.
DataPacket Global bare metal with 67 datacenter locations | Constant (Choopa) Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $240/mo | From $120/mo✓ |
| Best for | Network-intensive operators — CDNs, video and streaming platforms, VPN providers, game-traffic and mirror hosts — whose costs are driven by bandwidth volume | Teams wanting a single API and bill across global regions for mixed VM, bare metal, and GPU capacity, with an SLA strong enough for production |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 32 GB |
| Storage | — | 480 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 5 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 100% |
| Data-center count | 67✓ | 33 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €30.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €3.75 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 33 regions on six continents (list in specs) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit DataPacket → | Visit Constant (Choopa) → | |
DataPacket
Pros
- + Unshared 50-200 Gbps uplinks with unmetered traffic and no egress billing
- + 67 data centre locations on six continents on a private 330+ Tbps backbone
- + Current-generation AMD EPYC + NVMe + DDR5 hardware, in-stock machines deploy in about a day
- + DDoS Shield included, one IPv4 free per server, free /64 IPv6 blocks
- + Network-heavy reference customers (Discord, bunny.net, Nodecraft, Livepeer) validate traffic-spike resilience
Cons
- - $240/mo entry price excludes small and hobby workloads entirely
- - No cloud platform services: no snapshots, managed databases or autoscaling groups
- - Custom hardware, BYO IP and top uplink tiers are quote-only through sales
- - Thin third-party documentation and community content outside the company's own support
Constant (Choopa)
Pros
- + One platform across 33 regions: VMs, bare metal, GPU clusters, storage, managed databases, Kubernetes
- + Credit-backed 100% uptime SLA covering network and host node — stronger than most rivals on paper
- + Public, consistent pricing with hourly billing capped at 672 hours/month; mature API, CLI, Terraform support
- + Real bare metal range from 4-core E3 boxes to 128-core EPYC and 8-way H100/B200 GPU systems
- + BGP sessions with full tables, BYOIP, IPv6 in every region, free Anycast DNS
Cons
- - The brand in this listing is retired — Choopa was folded into Vultr in 2022 and no longer sells under its own name
- - Bare metal entry (~$120/mo) costs more than European specialists for comparable-era hardware
- - DDoS filtering beyond built-in mitigation is a $10/mo per-instance add-on; snapshots and backups also cost extra
- - Ticket-based big-platform support rather than the named-account service old Choopa customers knew
- - Billing edge cases: stopped instances can still bill on some lines, and percentage-based backups add up
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.