Hostwinds vs Linode (Akamai)
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hostwinds and Linode (Akamai).
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Hostwinds
0 reviews
4.0/5
Linode (Akamai)
0 reviews
Linode (Akamai) is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.4). Seattle-based hosting provider with VPS (Linux and Windows), dedicated servers, and shared hosting. Nightly backups included, 24/7/365 live chat support, and 99.9999% uptime SLA. Affordable starting price. Linode provides managed VPS instances on SSD storage with data centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. Built for developers and small-to-medium businesses needing reliable cloud infrastructure.
Hostwinds US VPS with nightly snapshots and 24/7 support | Linode (Akamai) High-performance Linux VPS hosting with predictable pricing. | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $3.29/mo✓ | From $5/mo |
| Best for | US small businesses and developers who want responsive 24/7 live support and predictable renewal pricing more than raw speed | Small production teams wanting an API-first Linux platform with a real uptime SLA, pooled transfer, managed Kubernetes and databases, and one vendor for compute plus edge delivery. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 25 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 100%✓ | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | 2 | 26✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €5.00 |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | — | 1,800 |
| Disk read (fio) | — | 800 MB/s |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | — | 14,000 |
| Network out | — | 0.5 Gbps |
| Latency (TTFB) | — | 30 ms |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyIndiaSingaporeJapan+3 |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingipv6ddos protectionbackups includedwindows availableus datacenterapi access | free tierhourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsmanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit Hostwinds → | Visit Linode (Akamai) → | |
Hostwinds
Pros
- + 24/7/365 live chat backed by staff with direct access to owned hardware
- + Flat, non-promotional pricing: shared from $3.29/mo, managed VPS from $7.14/mo
- + 99.9999% uptime SLA with 2N-redundant facility design and multi-carrier fibre
- + Owns and operates its own data centres, hardware and network gear
- + Windows and Linux VPS both available; dedicated servers built to order
Cons
- - US-only data centres (Seattle and Dallas) — poor shape for European and Asian audiences
- - Nightly backups are a paid add-on per company docs despite 'included' marketing language
- - No free domain; performance evidence is thin and partly self-published
- - Hourly billing and API access are tagged but unverified on the pages we read
Linode (Akamai)
Pros
- + Published hourly pricing with monthly caps and low egress overage ($0.005/GB)
- + 99.99% compute uptime SLA with pro-rata service credits; 99.9% for other services
- + Complete platform: LKE, managed databases, object storage, NodeBalancers, DNS, GPU
- + Excellent documentation and a well-documented REST API, CLI, and Terraform support
- + 25+ core data centers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and South America
Cons
- - Entry price-performance is not class-leading (our Nanode benchmark: CPU 1,800 at €5/mo)
- - Backups, snapshots, and managed databases are all paid add-ons
- - Product surface is fragmenting as Akamai folds Linode into its enterprise strategy
- - Service availability varies by region (Backups are core-regions-only)
- - Shared entry plans run on explicitly legacy hardware
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.