Skip to content

HostMonster vs FastComet

A detailed comparison to help you choose between HostMonster and FastComet.

Quick Verdict

2.5/5

HostMonster

0 reviews

3.2/5

FastComet

0 reviews

FastComet is rated higher (3.2 vs 2.5). HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah. 12 global datacenter locations

HostMonster

HostMonster

Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently

FastComet

FastComet

Shared hosting on SSD with free daily backups

Overview
Rating2.5 (0 reviews)3.2 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFree tier availableFrom $1.99/mo
Best forExisting HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signupsSmall businesses and agencies wanting managed shared or WordPress hosting near audiences in Asia, Australia or South America, with support that handles migrations and maintenance
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—1 vCPU
RAM—1 GB
Storage—10 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime—99.9%
Data-center count—12
€/vCPU/mo—€1.99
€/GB RAM/mo—€1.99
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Provo, Utah, US
Dallas, Fremont, Newark, Toronto, Sao Paulo, London, Frankfurt, Milan, Singapore, Tokyo, Mumbai, Sydney
Tags
Tags
us datacenter
backups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit HostMonster →Visit FastComet →

HostMonster

Pros

  • + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
  • + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
  • + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
  • + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus

Cons

  • - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
  • - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
  • - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
  • - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
  • - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
View full HostMonsterreview →

FastComet

Pros

  • + Twelve datacenters in ten countries at shared-hosting prices — rare geographic spread including Singapore, Mumbai, Tokyo, Sydney and São Paulo
  • + Fully managed model: migrations, SSL setup and WordPress optimization handled by support on every plan
  • + Per-plan resources stated openly (vCPU, RAM, NVMe storage) instead of vague 'unlimited' claims
  • + Documented SLA with real credits: 99.9% website uptime, 100% network target, 10% per downtime hour
  • + LiteSpeed + NVMe + AMD EPYC stack with free CDN, SSL, and daily backups across plans

Cons

  • - Renewals jump 333-400%: $1.99-$5.49 intro becomes $9.95-$24.95 per month
  • - The famous price-lock guarantee no longer exists; older reviews are out of date
  • - Acquired by World Host Group (April 2025) with reported support and infrastructure changes during transition
  • - Entry plan is thin: one site, 10 GB storage, 1 GB RAM, 1 vCPU
  • - No developer platform — no hourly billing, S3-compatible storage, Kubernetes or GPU options
View full FastCometreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.