Hetzner Storage Box vs Restic
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hetzner Storage Box and Restic.
Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | Restic Fast, secure, encrypted open source backup | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (47 reviews) | 4.6 (40 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Starting price | From €3/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. | Developers and sysadmins wanting a flexible, encrypted backup tool that can target any storage backend |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacentergdpr compliant | free tieropen source |
| Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | Visit Restic → | |
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Restic
Pros
- + Backs up to any storage backend — S3, B2, GCS, SFTP
- + Strong AES-256 encryption
- + No server — single binary
Cons
- - Command-line only
- - Repository management can be complex
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.