Hetzner Dedicated vs ColoCrossing
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hetzner Dedicated and ColoCrossing.
Quick Verdict
4.7/5
Hetzner Dedicated
285 reviews
3.6/5
ColoCrossing
304 reviews
Hetzner Dedicated is rated higher (4.7 vs 3.6). Hetzner's dedicated root servers offer some of the best value bare metal in Europe. From €39/month for Intel Xeon or AMD EPYC. RDNS, KVM access, and full root access. Located in Germany and Finland. ColoCrossing provides dedicated servers and colocation services with owned fiber infrastructure. Built for businesses needing high-performance computing, gaming, or content delivery with minimal network hops.
Hetzner Dedicated Bare metal servers with transparent pricing and no setup fees | ColoCrossing Bare metal servers with direct fiber access and low latency routing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.7 (285 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (304 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €39/mo | From €27/mo✓ |
| Best for | Infrastructure teams and developers needing full hardware control and Europe-based colocation with predictable costs. | Enterprises and high-traffic applications requiring low-latency, high-throughput infrastructure with direct network control. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedeu datacentergdpr compliantapi access | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterwindows available |
| Visit Hetzner Dedicated → | Visit ColoCrossing → | |
Hetzner Dedicated
Pros
- + Choose custom hardware specs without paying for unused resources
- + Access dedicated IP addresses with transparent bandwidth pricing
- + Deploy from multiple European and US data center locations
- + Use rescue system for system recovery and diagnostics
Cons
- - Limited to certain hardware generations; older configs may have reduced availability
- - Support response times slower than premium managed hosting providers
- - Requires technical knowledge for OS installation and server management
ColoCrossing
Pros
- + Operate your own fiber backbone reducing third-party dependencies
- + Access bare metal servers with customizable hardware configurations
- + Leverage direct peering relationships for optimized routing
- + Scale bandwidth independently without per-GB overage charges
Cons
- - Higher entry cost than shared hosting alternatives
- - Limited global data center footprint compared to mega-providers
- - Requires technical expertise for server management and configuration
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.