Hetzner DDoS Protection vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hetzner DDoS Protection and Gcore.
Hetzner DDoS Protection Hardware-backed DDoS mitigation for high-traffic infrastructure | Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (245 reviews)✓ | 4.8 (275 reviews) |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Organizations running high-traffic applications on Hetzner infrastructure who need native, straightforward DDoS mitigation without multi-vendor complexity. | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectioneu datacenter | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Hetzner DDoS Protection → | Visit Gcore → | |
Hetzner DDoS Protection
Pros
- + Deploy without external vendor lock-in or third-party dependencies
- + Handle multi-gigabit attacks via Hetzner's own infrastructure
- + Activate automatically or manually via API and console
- + Protect both Cloud and bare-metal servers in one service
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner infrastructure; cannot protect non-Hetzner targets
- - Requires understanding of traffic baseline for effective tuning
- - Fewer advanced customization options versus specialized DDoS providers
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.