Skip to content

Heroku vs Shuttle

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Heroku and Shuttle.

Quick Verdict

3.4/5

Heroku

0 reviews

3.4/5

Shuttle

0 reviews

Both Heroku and Shuttle are equally rated at 3.4/5. Heroku pioneered platform-as-a-service in 2007. Owned by Salesforce. Supports 10+ languages, huge addon marketplace (150+ addons). Removed free tier in 2022 but remains popular for ease of use. Eco plans restart. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.

Heroku

Heroku

The original PaaS — still the easiest deploy

Shuttle

Shuttle

Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config

Overview
Rating3.4 (0 reviews)3.4 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidfreemium
Starting priceFrom $5/moFree tier available✓
Best forTime-poor developers and small teams who want git-push deploys, a huge add-on ecosystem and zero server operations, and who accept premium per-unit pricing for itRust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—0 vCPU
RAM1 GB1 GB
Storage—1 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count12✓1
€/GB RAM/mo€5.00€0.00✓
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier✓
Data-center locations
Regions
useuDublinFrankfurtLondonMontreal+6
AWS eu-west-2 (London)
Tags
Tags
managed optionus datacentereu datacenterapi access
free tieropen sourceus datacenter
Visit Heroku →Visit Shuttle →

Heroku

Pros

  • + Still the smoothest deploy workflow in the market — git push and done
  • + Large add-on marketplace and mature language buildpack support
  • + Transparent dyno pricing with clear tiers from $5 to $1,500/month
  • + Automated OS patching, free SSL, unified logs and instant scaling
  • + Private Spaces and Shield options for network isolation and compliance

Cons

  • - Poor price-performance versus raw VPS compute
  • - No free tier since 2022; Eco dynos sleep and meter hours
  • - 2026 engineering pivot to stability — new features and new Enterprise contracts paused
  • - 2022 security breach remains part of the track record
  • - Only two Common Runtime regions, and region choice does not guarantee data residency
View full Herokureview →

Shuttle

Pros

  • + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
  • + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
  • + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
  • + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
  • + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code

Cons

  • - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
  • - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
  • - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
  • - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
  • - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
View full Shuttlereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.