Heroku vs Northflank Containers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Heroku and Northflank Containers.
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Heroku
0 reviews
3.9/5
Northflank Containers
0 reviews
Northflank Containers is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.4). Heroku pioneered platform-as-a-service in 2007. Owned by Salesforce. Supports 10+ languages, huge addon marketplace (150+ addons). Removed free tier in 2022 but remains popular for ease of use. Eco plans restart. Northflank provides container deployments with automatic Docker image builds from GitHub, background workers, cron jobs, and secret management. Kubernetes-powered with a developer-friendly interface.
Heroku The original PaaS — still the easiest deploy | Northflank Containers Container deployments with built-in CI/CD | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From $5/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Time-poor developers and small teams who want git-push deploys, a huge add-on ecosystem and zero server operations, and who accept premium per-unit pricing for it | Engineering teams wanting Heroku-grade developer experience with Kubernetes-grade control: GitHub-to-deployment pipelines with per-PR previews, multi-cloud deployment including your own VPC, and GPU/AI workloads on the same platform. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 12 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €5.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | useuDublinFrankfurtLondonMontreal+6 | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | managed optionus datacentereu datacenterapi access | free tiermanaged optionteam featuresapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit Heroku → | Visit Northflank Containers → | |
Heroku
Pros
- + Still the smoothest deploy workflow in the market — git push and done
- + Large add-on marketplace and mature language buildpack support
- + Transparent dyno pricing with clear tiers from $5 to $1,500/month
- + Automated OS patching, free SSL, unified logs and instant scaling
- + Private Spaces and Shield options for network isolation and compliance
Cons
- - Poor price-performance versus raw VPS compute
- - No free tier since 2022; Eco dynos sleep and meter hours
- - 2026 engineering pivot to stability — new features and new Enterprise contracts paused
- - 2022 security breach remains part of the track record
- - Only two Common Runtime regions, and region choice does not guarantee data residency
Northflank Containers
Pros
- + Per-second, usage-based pricing with published unit rates and no seat fees
- + Real free Sandbox: 2 services, 2 jobs, 1 database, up to $20/mo resources, always-on compute
- + BYOC runs the platform in your AWS/GCP/Azure/Oracle VPC while you keep your cloud commitments
- + Strong CI/CD: per-PR preview environments, stored builds with rollback, release pipelines
- + GPU workloads (L4/A100/H100), Jupyter, secure code execution, RWX volumes: AI-ready beyond typical PaaS
- + UI, CLI, API, and GitOps control surfaces with RBAC, secrets, and audit-oriented enterprise features
Cons
- - Young company (founded 2019, Series A): less operational track record than incumbents
- - Contractual SLA and 24/7 support are Enterprise-only
- - Storage, IOPS, throughput, egress, and gateway line items stack up on database-heavy architectures
- - Card/payment-method requirement for the free tier conflicts between the pricing page and billing docs
- - Deep platform abstraction means application-level lock-in even with BYOC
- - Documentation is thorough on features but thin on migration patterns and BYOC networking edge cases
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.