Hasura Cloud vs TigerData
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hasura Cloud and TigerData.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Hasura Cloud
0 reviews
4.2/5
TigerData
0 reviews
TigerData is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Hasura (now Hasura DDN) generates a production GraphQL API from databases, code and existing APIs, with model-based pricing, a global edge network and an open-source self-hostable engine TigerData, from the creators of TimescaleDB, is a PostgreSQL cloud platform built for time-series and real-time analytics workloads at large scale, aimed at developers and enterprises.
Hasura Cloud Managed supergraph platform (Hasura DDN) generating GraphQL APIs from databases, code and APIs | TigerData PostgreSQL-native time-series database for metrics, events, and analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $30/mo |
| Best for | Teams wanting a production GraphQL API across multiple data sources without building a resolver layer — and solo developers who can run a real product on the free tier | Teams building observability, IoT/telemetry, financial or real-time analytics platforms who want time-series performance inside standard PostgreSQL and can run the ops model of a managed Postgres service. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 13 AWS regions + 4 Azure regions across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and South America |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit Hasura Cloud → | Visit TigerData → | |
Hasura Cloud
Pros
- + Free tier includes unlimited models, unlimited API requests and the global edge network
- + Per-active-model pricing charges only for models with real traffic
- + Full API layer out of the box: queries, subscriptions, authorization, schema registry
- + Open-source engine with a self-hosting escape hatch
- + SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliance on every tier
Cons
- - Hasura-specific concepts (models, supergraphs, active models) take real learning
- - Per-model cost scales with a wide, hot schema
- - No published uptime SLA or support response-time matrix
- - Data residency, SSO, audit logs and HIPAA are Advanced-tier features
- - GraphQL is a bigger commitment than a plain REST layer for simple CRUD
TigerData
Pros
- + Full SQL and the PostgreSQL extension ecosystem — hypertables, continuous aggregates and 90%+ compression without a new query language
- + Published consumption pricing (compute from $30/month, storage $0.177-0.212/GB-month) with hourly metering and no instance-size lock-in
- + 17 regions across AWS and Azure with EU, US and APAC residency selectable at creation
- + Reliability productized: multi-AZ HA, PITR up to 14 days, backup retention to 180 days, cross-region restore, public SLA and status page
- + Open-source TimescaleDB escape hatch — self-hosting stays viable, which keeps pricing honest
Cons
- - Hourly compute meter bills full hours and forgotten scale-ups at the higher config are expensive
- - Serious reliability and security features (multi-node HA, 14-day PITR, SOC 2, private endpoints) gated behind Scale or Enterprise
- - PostgreSQL and time-series concepts (chunks, compression/retention policies) assumed — not a zero-ops database for non-database teams
- - Effective storage price assumes 5x compression; actual ratios are workload-dependent
- - Aiven-partnered legacy MST product carries a different (99.99%) SLA — easy to confuse with Tiger Cloud
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.