Hasura Cloud vs MongoDB Atlas
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hasura Cloud and MongoDB Atlas.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Hasura Cloud
0 reviews
4.1/5
MongoDB Atlas
0 reviews
MongoDB Atlas is rated higher (4.1 vs 4.0). Hasura (now Hasura DDN) generates a production GraphQL API from databases, code and existing APIs, with model-based pricing, a global edge network and an open-source self-hostable engine MongoDB Atlas is the managed cloud version of MongoDB. Available on AWS, GCP, and Azure. Full-text search, vector search, time-series collections, and usage-priced Flex tiers. Free M0 cluster forever.
Hasura Cloud Managed supergraph platform (Hasura DDN) generating GraphQL APIs from databases, code and APIs | MongoDB Atlas The cloud database for modern apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams wanting a production GraphQL API across multiple data sources without building a resolver layer — and solo developers who can run a real product on the free tier | Application-first teams that want production MongoDB with multi-AZ resilience and no DBA, plus developers who want a free tier that can grow into paid tiers. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | ["AWS", "Google Cloud", "Microsoft Azure"] |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Hasura Cloud → | Visit MongoDB Atlas → | |
Hasura Cloud
Pros
- + Free tier includes unlimited models, unlimited API requests and the global edge network
- + Per-active-model pricing charges only for models with real traffic
- + Full API layer out of the box: queries, subscriptions, authorization, schema registry
- + Open-source engine with a self-hosting escape hatch
- + SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR compliance on every tier
Cons
- - Hasura-specific concepts (models, supergraphs, active models) take real learning
- - Per-model cost scales with a wide, hot schema
- - No published uptime SLA or support response-time matrix
- - Data residency, SSO, audit logs and HIPAA are Advanced-tier features
- - GraphQL is a bigger commitment than a plain REST layer for simple CRUD
MongoDB Atlas
Pros
- + Genuinely useful free M0 tier (512MB forever) with the same drivers and code path as production
- + Multi-cloud: 125+ regions across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, with cross-region and cross-provider node placement
- + Automated operations: three-node cross-AZ replica sets, failover, patching, point-in-time recovery, storage auto-scaling
- + 99.995% uptime SLA on Dedicated tiers with clearly documented exclusions and service-credit ladder
- + Integrated full-text and vector search, time-series collections, and Terraform/API automation
Cons
- - Per-node billing: a production replica set triples the advertised node price; sharded clusters multiply again
- - Backups on Dedicated, egress, search add-ons, and support are billed separately — invoice drift is common
- - No SLA and no continuous backups on Free or Flex; M0 cannot be resized into a paid cluster
- - Proprietary add-ons (Atlas Search, Vector Search, Data Federation) create soft lock-in
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.