Grafana Cloud vs SigNoz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Grafana Cloud and SigNoz.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Grafana Cloud
0 reviews
4.0/5
SigNoz
0 reviews
SigNoz is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Grafana Cloud provides managed Grafana, Prometheus, Loki (logs), Tempo (traces), and k6 (load testing). Free tier includes 10,000 metrics series. Open source self-hosting also available. SigNoz is a full-stack open source observability platform — metrics, traces, and logs in one. Datadog alternative you can self-host. Uses ClickHouse for efficient storage.
Grafana Cloud Open source observability platform — cloud and self-hosted | SigNoz Open-source observability platform for logs, metrics, and traces | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams wanting a managed, self-hostable observability stack with a genuinely useful free tier and metrics, logs, and traces under one pane | Engineering teams priced out of Datadog or New Relic that want OpenTelemetry-native logs, metrics and traces with computable usage-based costs and US/EU/India data residency. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United States, European Union, India (SigNoz Cloud regions) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Grafana Cloud → | Visit SigNoz → | |
Grafana Cloud
Pros
- + Open source core (AGPLv3) across Grafana/Mimir/Loki/Tempo/Pyroscope — a real self-host exit
- + Permanent free tier: 10k metric series, 50 GB logs/traces/profiles, 500 k6 VUh, no credit card
- + Public Pro pricing ($19/mo platform fee, from $6.50/1k series) with automatic volume discounts
- + 42 stack regions on AWS, Azure, and GCP including a Federal Cloud option
Cons
- - Usage-based billing punishes metric cardinality and log verbosity — bills can spike on app-side mistakes
- - PromQL/LogQL and label design have a real learning curve
- - SLA is 99.5% (paid plans only) — below hyperscaler commitments
- - Some enterprise RBAC/audit/reporting features require a quote-based Enterprise plan
SigNoz
Pros
- + Usage-based pricing with published per-unit rates ($0.30/GB logs and traces, $0.10/mn metric samples) and no per-user or per-host billing
- + OpenTelemetry-native: no proprietary SDKs, so instrumentation does not lock you in
- + Logs, metrics, traces, APM, exceptions and alerts correlated in one ClickHouse-backed product
- + Self-hostable open-source community edition plus cloud regions in the US, EU and India with SOC2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
- + Worked pricing examples and a bill calculator published — costs are computable before you commit
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier (from $4,000/month)
- - Self-hosted community edition makes storage, scaling, upgrades and backups your operational problem
- - Usage bills move with retention choices and noisy telemetry; the $49 entry tier shows a struck-through $199 base price
- - Narrower turnkey integration ecosystem than Datadog; RBAC is beta and audit logs/multi-tenancy are roadmap items
- - Migration tooling and dedicated Slack support are gated at spends above $999/month
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.