Google Artifact Registry vs Shuttle
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Google Artifact Registry and Shuttle.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
Google Artifact Registry
0 reviews
3.4/5
Shuttle
0 reviews
Google Artifact Registry is rated higher (3.7 vs 3.4). Google Artifact Registry stores Docker container images, Helm charts, npm, Maven, and Python packages in one place. Vulnerability scanning built-in. Integrates with Cloud Build and GKE. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.
Google Artifact Registry Universal package manager from Google Cloud | Shuttle Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.4 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GCP-centric teams wanting one managed registry for images and packages with built-in scanning and deployment-policy hooks | Rust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | 1 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | AWS eu-west-2 (London) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceus datacenter |
| Visit Google Artifact Registry → | Visit Shuttle → | |
Google Artifact Registry
Pros
- + One registry for container images and language/OS packages with unified IAM and audit
- + Free storage tier (0.5 GiB per billing account/month) and cheap per-GiB pricing beyond it
- + Remote/virtual repositories proxy and cache public upstreams behind one endpoint
- + Deep GCP integration: GKE, Cloud Build, Binary Authorization, VPC Service Controls, CMEK
Cons
- - Management plane is GCP-only — poor fit for multi-cloud portability requirements
- - Cross-region data transfer charges ($0.01–$0.15/GiB) can surprise teams with scattered repos
- - Vulnerability scanning billed separately via Artifact Analysis; enabling the API bills both new and legacy products
- - No product-specific published SLA
Shuttle
Pros
- + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
- + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
- + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
- + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
- + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code
Cons
- - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
- - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
- - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
- - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
- - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.