Google Artifact Registry vs Quay.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Google Artifact Registry and Quay.io.
Google Artifact Registry Universal package manager from Google Cloud | Quay.io Enterprise container registry from Red Hat | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (299 reviews) | 4.5 (312 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GCP-invested teams wanting a universal package and container registry with built-in vulnerability scanning | Enterprise teams using Red Hat/OpenShift who need enterprise security scanning and audit logging for containers |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierteam featuresssoapi access |
| Visit Google Artifact Registry → | Visit Quay.io → | |
Google Artifact Registry
Pros
- + Multi-format: Docker, Helm, npm, Maven, Python
- + Vulnerability scanning built-in
- + Deep GKE and Cloud Build integration
Cons
- - GCP ecosystem required
- - Pricing per GB storage and egress
Quay.io
Pros
- + Enterprise security scanning for CVEs
- + Robot accounts for CI/CD automation
- + Red Hat support and trust
Cons
- - Red Hat pricing model can be complex
- - Less developer-friendly than Docker Hub for individuals
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.