Google Artifact Registry vs Quay.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Google Artifact Registry and Quay.io.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Google Artifact Registry
299 reviews
4.5/5
Quay.io
312 reviews
Quay.io is rated higher (4.5 vs 3.6). Google Artifact Registry stores Docker container images, Helm charts, npm, Maven, and Python packages in one place. Vulnerability scanning built-in. Integrates with Cloud Build and GKE. Quay.io is an enterprise container registry from Red Hat (IBM). Security scanning, robot accounts, teams, and organizations. Used by large enterprises needing audit logging.
Google Artifact Registry Universal package manager from Google Cloud | Quay.io Enterprise container registry from Red Hat | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (299 reviews) | 4.5 (312 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GCP-invested teams wanting a universal package and container registry with built-in vulnerability scanning | Enterprise teams using Red Hat/OpenShift who need enterprise security scanning and audit logging for containers |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierteam featuresssoapi access |
| Visit Google Artifact Registry → | Visit Quay.io → | |
Google Artifact Registry
Pros
- + Multi-format: Docker, Helm, npm, Maven, Python
- + Vulnerability scanning built-in
- + Deep GKE and Cloud Build integration
Cons
- - GCP ecosystem required
- - Pricing per GB storage and egress
Quay.io
Pros
- + Enterprise security scanning for CVEs
- + Robot accounts for CI/CD automation
- + Red Hat support and trust
Cons
- - Red Hat pricing model can be complex
- - Less developer-friendly than Docker Hub for individuals
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.