Google Artifact Registry vs GitHub Container Registry
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Google Artifact Registry and GitHub Container Registry.
Google Artifact Registry Universal package manager from Google Cloud | GitHub Container Registry Container registry integrated with GitHub Actions | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (299 reviews) | 4.0 (152 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GCP-invested teams wanting a universal package and container registry with built-in vulnerability scanning | GitHub users who want container images stored alongside their code in the same GitHub account |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierapi access |
| Visit Google Artifact Registry → | Visit GitHub Container Registry → | |
Google Artifact Registry
Pros
- + Multi-format: Docker, Helm, npm, Maven, Python
- + Vulnerability scanning built-in
- + Deep GKE and Cloud Build integration
Cons
- - GCP ecosystem required
- - Pricing per GB storage and egress
GitHub Container Registry
Pros
- + Free for public repositories
- + Deep GitHub Actions integration
- + Part of existing GitHub account
Cons
- - Private image storage counted against GitHub plan storage
- - Less flexible than dedicated registry
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.