GitHub Container Registry vs Quay.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between GitHub Container Registry and Quay.io.
GitHub Container Registry Container registry integrated with GitHub Actions | Quay.io Enterprise container registry from Red Hat | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (152 reviews) | 4.5 (312 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GitHub users who want container images stored alongside their code in the same GitHub account | Enterprise teams using Red Hat/OpenShift who need enterprise security scanning and audit logging for containers |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tierteam featuresssoapi access |
| Visit GitHub Container Registry → | Visit Quay.io → | |
GitHub Container Registry
Pros
- + Free for public repositories
- + Deep GitHub Actions integration
- + Part of existing GitHub account
Cons
- - Private image storage counted against GitHub plan storage
- - Less flexible than dedicated registry
Quay.io
Pros
- + Enterprise security scanning for CVEs
- + Robot accounts for CI/CD automation
- + Red Hat support and trust
Cons
- - Red Hat pricing model can be complex
- - Less developer-friendly than Docker Hub for individuals
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.