Gcore vs AWS WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Gcore and AWS WAF.
Quick Verdict
4.8/5
Gcore
275 reviews
4.9/5
AWS WAF
8 reviews
AWS WAF is rated higher (4.9 vs 4.8). Gcore is a European CDN and cloud provider with 150+ PoPs including strong coverage in Russia, CIS, Middle East, and Africa. CDN, cloud compute, streaming, and DDoS protection. AWS WAF is Amazon's web application firewall that can be attached to CloudFront, ALB, or API Gateway. Pay per rule ($1/rule/month) and per million requests ($0.60). Integrates with AWS Shield.
Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS |  AWS WAF Amazon WAF integrated with CloudFront and ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (275 reviews) | 4.9 (8 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €5/mo |
| Best for | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint | AWS-invested applications that need WAF tightly integrated with their existing CloudFront or ALB setup |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | api accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Gcore → | Visit AWS WAF → | |
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
AWS WAF
Pros
- + Deep AWS integration
- + Per-rule pricing — cost-effective for simple use
- + Works with CloudFront, ALB, API Gateway
Cons
- - Complex rule management
- - Requires AWS expertise to use effectively
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.