Gcore vs Cloudflare WAF
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Gcore and Cloudflare WAF.
Quick Verdict
4.8/5
Gcore
275 reviews
3.5/5
Cloudflare WAF
249 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (4.8 vs 3.5). Gcore is a European CDN and cloud provider with 150+ PoPs including strong coverage in Russia, CIS, Middle East, and Africa. CDN, cloud compute, streaming, and DDoS protection. Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules.
Gcore Global CDN with 150+ PoPs including Russia and CIS | Cloudflare WAF Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (275 reviews)✓ | 3.5 (249 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Applications needing CDN coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa beyond Cloudflare's footprint | Every website — Cloudflare WAF is the standard baseline for web application firewall protection |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Gcore → | Visit Cloudflare WAF → | |
Gcore
Pros
- + Strong CIS, Russia, Middle East coverage
- + 150+ PoPs
- + Free CDN tier available
Cons
- - Luxembourg HQ but some CIS/Russia coverage raises questions
- - Less known brand in Western markets
Cloudflare WAF
Pros
- + Free WAF rules on all plans
- + DDoS mitigation up to 142Tbps
- + 300+ PoP global network absorbs attacks
Cons
- - Advanced WAF rules require Pro+ plan
- - Some legitimate traffic can be blocked
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.