Skip to content

Gcore vs Bunny Shield

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Gcore and Bunny Shield.

Quick Verdict

3.8/5

Gcore

0 reviews

3.8/5

Bunny Shield

0 reviews

Both Gcore and Bunny Shield are equally rated at 3.8/5. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa. Bunny Shield is the security layer of Bunny.net: WAF, DDoS mitigation, rate limiting, bot detection, access lists, and upload scanning for sites and APIs served through Bunny's edge network. Free Basic tier; Advanced $9.50/month, Business $99/month.

Gcore

Gcore

Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage

Bunny Shield

Bunny Shield

DDoS protection and Web Application Firewall for content delivery

Overview
Rating3.8 (0 reviews)3.8 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelpay-as-you-gofreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forApplications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier.Bunny CDN customers — especially UGC and media platforms — who want WAF, bot, and rate-limit protection without a second security vendor
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Gcore →Visit Bunny Shield →

Gcore

Pros

  • + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
  • + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
  • + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
  • + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
  • + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers

Cons

  • - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
  • - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
  • - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
  • - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
View full Gcorereview →

Bunny Shield

Pros

  • + Free Basic tier is genuinely protective: 71 WAF rules, 25M requests/month, upload scanning included
  • + Full published feature matrix with explicit overage rates — pricing clarity above the category norm
  • + Runs on the same 119-center edge as Bunny CDN, so protection adds no second network hop
  • + Upload scanning for malware and CSAM is rare outside enterprise UGC platforms' tooling
  • + API Guardian validates and authenticates API traffic at the edge before it reaches origin

Cons

  • - Only protects properties served through Bunny's network — no stand-alone mode
  • - Bot mitigation and inspection depth tier-gated: complex bots require the $99/month Business plan
  • - Custom WAF rules capped at 10 (Advanced) and 25 (Business); access lists capped by entries
  • - Request-based billing keeps metering during attacks unless limits are configured
  • - Younger product with less community depth and fewer documented edge cases than Cloudflare's WAF
View full Bunny Shieldreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.