Skip to content

Fly Machines vs Shuttle

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fly Machines and Shuttle.

Quick Verdict

3.9/5

Fly Machines

0 reviews

3.4/5

Shuttle

0 reviews

Fly Machines is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.4). Fly Machines are Fly.io's fast-starting virtual machines for containerised workloads. Start in 300ms, stop when idle to save costs. Used for auto-scaling web services and ephemeral compute. Shuttle deploys Rust backend services with zero configuration — annotate your code with macros and Shuttle handles the infrastructure. No YAML, no Terraform. Pay-per-use serverless Rust.

Fly Machines

Fly Machines

Fast-starting VMs for containerised apps at the edge

Shuttle

Shuttle

Deploy Rust backends from your code — no config

Overview
Rating3.9 (0 reviews)✓3.4 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelusage-basedfreemium
Starting priceFrom $2.19/moFree tier available✓
Best forDevelopers who want fast-starting containers that scale to zero between requests at the edge, and teams building custom control planes on a VM-per-container APIRust developers — solo or small teams — who want a backend live in minutes from annotated code and can accept a London-only region and no contractual uptime guarantee.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores—0 vCPU
RAM—1 GB
Storage—1 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.9%—
Data-center count17✓1
€/GB RAM/mo—€0.00
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Netherlands, Sweden, France, Germany, UK, US, Canada, Brazil, South Africa, Japan, Singapore, Australia
AWS eu-west-2 (London)
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
free tieropen sourceus datacenter
Visit Fly Machines →Visit Shuttle →

Fly Machines

Pros

  • + ~300ms VM boot with automatic stop when idle — real scale-to-zero economics for request-driven workloads
  • + Billed by the second with a fully published rate card; smallest Machine $2.19/30 days running
  • + Low-level lifecycle control via REST API: create, start, stop, clone, update, destroy per VM
  • + 17 regions on Fly's own hardware with per-Machine region placement
  • + Fast restart from stopped state — assembled rootfs stays on the worker host

Cons

  • - Fly.io-only API and infrastructure — no orchestration portability
  • - Running the raw API means building your own scaling, placement retry and health logic
  • - Always-on and idle costs accumulate: stopped rootfs $0.15/GB/month, volumes $0.15/GB/month, dedicated IPv4 $2/month
  • - Capacity limits per region and host can make Machine placement fail
  • - No free tier — only a 2-VM-hour/7-day trial — and no uptime SLA outside Enterprise plans
View full Fly Machinesreview →

Shuttle

Pros

  • + Infrastructure from code annotations: databases, secrets and static assets provisioned from function signatures, no YAML or Terraform
  • + Real free tier (0.25 vCPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 0.5 GB database, 100 build minutes/month) with custom domain support
  • + Published, itemized usage rates ($0.12/GB storage, $0.025/build minute, $0.10/GB egress) instead of sales-quoted pricing
  • + Clear isolation tiering: spot instances on free, reserved VM-isolated instances from Pro
  • + First-class Rust framework support (Axum, Actix Web, Rocket, Serenity) and open-source platform code

Cons

  • - Rust only — other language stacks are not supported today
  • - Single AWS region (London, eu-west-2) with no region choice below the not-yet-available Enterprise tier
  • - No published uptime SLA on any current tier; support is Discord-based with 1-business-day response on Pro
  • - Steep jump from $20/mo Pro to $250/mo Growth, with metered usage on top of every paid tier
  • - Tier contents have changed materially over time (projects and included egress were cut in 2025)
View full Shuttlereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.